IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence, the Maastricht Criteria, and Their Benefits

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Developments forced a shift from the early heavy weight of political designs to economic considerations for a unified Europe. At the core of the European Economic Union are the Maastricht convergence criteria, which through monetary and fiscal stability aim at building the foundations of the euro. The costs and benefits of the monetary union appear to be small and rather difficult to estimate precisely, but the contribution of Maastricht stability rates to real per capita growth and the desire of countries to join the union suggest that inclusion is desirable and definitely preferable to exclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Afxentiou, Panos, 2000. "Convergence, the Maastricht Criteria, and Their Benefits," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 53(4), pages 437-448.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bagella, Michele & Becchetti, Leonardo & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2004. "The anticipated and concurring effects of the EMU: exchange rate volatility, institutions and growth," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1053-1080.
    2. Wan, Zheng & Wang, Xuefeng & Sperling, Daniel, 2013. "Policy and politics behind the public transportation systems of China's medium-sized cities: Evidence from the Huizhou reform," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, 2009. "Challenges of Monetary Integration in CEE," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 5, pages 32-37.
    4. Staehr, Karsten, 2008. "Fiscal policies and business cycles in an enlarged euro area," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 46-69, March.
    5. Sehgal, Sanjay & Gupta, Priyanshi & Deisting, Florent, 2014. "Assessing Time-Varying Stock Market Integration in EMU for Normal and Crisis Periods," MPRA Paper 64078, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Stefan Marian DUMITRU, 2017. "The effectiveness of the EU economic governance framework," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9(4), pages 529-547, December.
    7. António Afonso & Raquel Balhote, 2014. "Interactions between Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy," Working Papers Department of Economics 2014/13, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    8. Ljubisavljević, Snežana & Grbić, Milka, 2017. "External Audit of Public Finance in Function of Macroeconomic Stability," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 165-171, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.