Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Les inconvénients d’un dépôt de brevet pour une entreprise innovatrice

Contents:

Author Info

  • Crampes, Claude

    (Université des Sciences sociales de Toulouse)

Abstract

We study a problem of choice between patenting or keeping secret a process innovation in a duopoly game. We show that patent is the best choice for a mean innovation; but when the innovation is highly profitable, or on the contrary, when its profitability is low, the inventing firm is better off if not patenting. Le dépôt d’un brevet n’est pas nécessairement la meilleure façon de protéger une innovation. En effet, le monopole d’exploitation que confère un brevet est limité à une vingtaine d’années alors qu’en conservant son innovation secrète l’inventeur peut espérer garder l’exclusivité de sa technologie au-delà du terme légal d’un brevet.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/601389ar
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.

Volume (Year): 62 (1986)
Issue (Month): 4 (décembre)
Pages: 521-534

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:62:y:1986:i:4:p:521-534

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.scse.ca/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. repec:hal:cesptp:halshs-00496942 is not listed on IDEAS
  2. repec:hal:cesptp:halshs-00115666 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. David Encaoua & Yassine Lefouili, 2006. "Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing," CESifo Working Paper Series 1715, CESifo Group Munich.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:62:y:1986:i:4:p:521-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.