Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Mesure de la productivité : la méthode de Divisia

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ouellette, Pierre

    (C.R.D.E., Université de Montréal)

  • Lasserre, Pierre

    (C.R.D.E., Université de Montréal)

Abstract

We survey and synthetize the literature on the measurement of technical progress by the method of Divisia. The approach is first presented under a number of crucial simplifying assumptions. Then we relax those assumptions to allow for non constant returns, the presence of quasi-fix factors of production, and the absence of perfect competition. This is followed by a discussion on the limits of the method and on some of the ways those limits be overcome. Cet article constitue un survol de la littérature portant sur la mesure du progrès technique par la méthode de Divisia. Dans un premier temps, la méthode est exposée en posant a priori certaines hypothèses simplificatrices. Dans un deuxième temps, ces hypothèses sont mises de côté de façon à englober le cas des firmes en présence de rendements non unitaires, de facteurs quasi fixes et en l’absence de concurrence parfaite. Le tout est suivi d’une discussion sur les limites de la méthode et de la façon dont on peut envisager de les dépasser.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/601350ar
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.

Volume (Year): 61 (1985)
Issue (Month): 4 (décembre)
Pages: 507-526

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:61:y:1985:i:4:p:507-526

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.scse.ca/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Sato, Ryuzo, 1970. "The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 11(2), pages 179-208, June.
  2. Erwin Diewert, 2000. "The Challenge of Total Factor Productivity," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 1, pages 45-52, Fall.
  3. Nelson, Richard R, 1981. "Research on Productivity Growth and Productivity Differences: Dead Ends and New Departures," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1029-64, September.
  4. Ouellette, P. & Lasserre, P., 1984. "Mesure du Progres Technique: Theories et Methodes," Cahiers de recherche 8425, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Charles Dufour & Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry, 1995. "Regulation and Productivity in the Quebec Manufacturing Sector," CIRANO Working Papers 95s-12, CIRANO.
  2. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2001. "Productivité et réglementation environnementale: une analyse de l'hypothèse de Porter," Cahiers de recherche 0107, Université Laval - Département d'économique.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:61:y:1985:i:4:p:507-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.