Vers une tarification équitable de l’assurance?
AbstractThe intensification of competition on insurance markets is giving more and more audience to the principle of premiums personalization. Antagonistic to the traditional principe of risks mutualization, this new trend aims at "equitable" insurance tariffs, i.e. tariffs such that premiums are exactly proportioned to risks. This article is concerned with two questions: L’intensification de la concurrence sur certains marchés d’assurance a encouragé l’émergence du principe de la personnalisation des primes, qui s’oppose au traditionnel principe de mutualisation des risques. Menée à son extrême, la personnalisation conduirait à une tarification « équitable » de l’assurance, c’est-à-dire telle que la prime de chaque assuré est exactement proportionnée au risque qu’il représente. Cet article se propose de répondre à deux questions :
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.
Volume (Year): 61 (1985)
Issue (Month): 4 (décembre)
Other versions of this item:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wilson, Charles, 1977. "A model of insurance markets with incomplete information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 167-207, December.
- John G. Riley, 1974.
UCLA Economics Working Papers
050, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Quinzii, Martine & Rochet, Jean-Charles, 1985. "Multidimensional signalling," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 261-284, June.
- Spence, Michael, 1978. "Product differentiation and performance in insurance markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 427-447, December.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.