Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Role of Policy in a Matching Model with Judicial Interference

Contents:

Author Info

  • Riccardo TILLI

Abstract

Economic literature on the labour market has not found univocal results concerning the effects of employment protection on unemployment (Bentolila and Bertola 1990; Bertola 1990; Lazear 1990). The reason is that employment protection produces two effects that work in opposite directions: on one hand, employment protection prevents firing, while, on the other hand, it discourages firms from hiring workers, because their subsequent dismissal is costly. Unemployment increases only if the second effect dominates the first, but it is not possible to establish "a priori" which of the two will prevail. Recently, Ichino, Polo and Rettore (2001) have shown that judges can be biased by labour market conditions, that is they tend to interpret employment protection legislation in favour of workers when labour market conditions get worse for them. This fact has interesting macroeconomic implications, when studying labour market structure and economic policy. The first point has been already considered in Tilli (2002), where he assumed firing costs as a decreasing function of labour market conditions and he determined their effective level endogenously. The main qualitative result obtained from this "judicial interference" is that employment protection legislation which allows the judges a large degree of interpretation, can increase the institutional rigidities of the labour market. In this paper we study the effects of five policy instruments on equilibrium unemployment in a search and matching model with judicial interference. We consider firing costs as an inverse function of labour market conditions so, when labour market conditions worsen for workers, the interpretation activity of judges tends to increase the strictness of employment protection legislation. An interesting feature of the model is that it can potentially produce multiple equilibria, which could reflect different labour market structures in terms of inflows into unemployment and average duration of unemployment. In the case of unique equilibrium, the qualitative analysis shows that some policy instruments could potentially change the direction of the effects on equilibrium unemployment when judicial interference works. The results of a numerical simulation confirm that the effects of some policy instruments may have different impacts on equilibrium unemployment when there is judicial interference. In particular, active labour market policies, such as hiring and wage subsidies, may reduce the strictness of employment protection with positive effects on welfare. Regarding passive policies, judicial interference may limit the increase of the unemployment rate caused by unemployment benefits, but this leads to a lower level of welfare.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.mulino.it/rivisteweb/scheda_articolo.php?id_articolo=12529
Download Restriction: download restricted to subscribers, see http://www.mulino.it for details

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by SIE - Societa' Italiana degli Economisti (I) in its journal Rivista Italiana degli Economisti.

Volume (Year): 8 (2003)
Issue (Month): 3 (December)
Pages: 429-454

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:rie:review:v:8:y:2003:i:3:n:4

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Piazzale Martelli, 8, 60121 Ancona (Italy)
Email:
Web page: http://www.siecon.org
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.mulino.it/edizioni/riviste/scheda_rivista.php?issn=1593-8662

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rie:review:v:8:y:2003:i:3:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SIE).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.