Quale modello di federalismo fiscale nella nuova Costituzione italiana?
AbstractThe Italian Constitution was emended in 2001 to change the distribution of powers between national and regional governments. More spending and taxing powers are now assigned to regional governments. The provisions of the new Constitution are not sufficient to completely define a new system of fiscal federalism. The incompleteness is most evident with respect to the fundamental question whether the reform has increased or not the degree of decentralization of the government sector. The national government has yielded legislative powers on activities such as education, welfare, mass transportation and others but has maintained the power to define the level of outputs regional governments are expected to provide in a variety of fields. The paper argues that a strictly regulated decentralization is no improvement upon centralized provision. This question is relevant because the new Constitution does not define the extent and the properties of the equalizing grant programs that are expected to integrate the tax revenue of poor regions. A case is presented for the extent of interregional equalization to be made an inverse function of the degree of regional autonomy. Defining a reasonable system of fiscal federalism requires a comprehensive interpretation of the new Constitution provisions and some help from the theoretical propositions of fiscal federalism. It also requires political choices on a variety of parameters that are not completely defined in the new Constitution. The paper provides an outline of a legislative proposal that solves - albeit from a personal point of view - the under-determination of the new Constitution. Where autonomy is unbounded (as it is the case with a limited subset of the new regional powers) then partial equalization is called for; where regional autonomy is bounded by the constraint of equal provision (as it is the case with health, education and social welfare spending) then full financial equalization is required. In the former case, block unconditional grants would be called for; in the latter national government grants should be of the conditional variety.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by SIE - Societa' Italiana degli Economisti (I) in its journal Rivista Italiana degli Economisti.
Volume (Year): 8 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SIE).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.