IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v2y2014i1p126-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UK Business Perceptions of Sustainability: A Psychological Examination of Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Talbot
  • Michael Brown

Abstract

The increasing levels of sustainability rhetoric emanating from the UK government and business organisations appear to indicate that the sustainability paradigm has been embraced by UK Business. The degree of this acceptance is examined through the analysis of the annual Britain¡¯s Most Admired Companies (BMAC) survey conducted by the British Chartered Management Institute (CMI) between the periods 1994-2011 involving on average two hundred and thirty eight companies per survey. The analysis demonstrates that on every occasion the corporate social and environmental category has ranked last amongst corporate managements¡¯ perceptions. These perceptions are evaluated through applying the lens of psychological sustainability and through the education and knowledge of corporate management where traditional financial and management paradigms still dominate. An exception to this status quo is the Co-Op Bank which has dominant sustainability credentials but which has been consistently ranked lower in the overall survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Talbot & Michael Brown, 2014. "UK Business Perceptions of Sustainability: A Psychological Examination of Theory and Practice," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 126-136, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:126-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/284/248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/284
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BMAC Survey; community and environmental responsibility; sustainability; management perceptions and psychology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:126-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.