IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rtiers/tiers_1293-8882_2003_num_44_174_5396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Réforme agraire et marché foncier : la réflexion aux États-Unis et son impact dans les institutions multilatérales de développement

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Delahaye

Abstract

[eng] Olivier DELAHAYE — Agrarian reform and land market : Evolution of agricultural land economics in the United States, and its influence in multilateral institutions . us land economics approach was reshaped through the 20th century, according to the evolution of domestic and foreign contexts. The freehold estate constitution let the place of land regulating main agent to the market. Land reform, become a central point in US foreign policy after World War II, was focused on from 1945, giving place to land market in the 1980s. Neo-institutionalist approaches about land market imperfections is renewing the reflection, in which are increasingly participating multilateral institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Delahaye, 2003. "Réforme agraire et marché foncier : la réflexion aux États-Unis et son impact dans les institutions multilatérales de développement," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(174), pages 449-466.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:rtiers:tiers_1293-8882_2003_num_44_174_5396
    DOI: 10.3406/tiers.2003.5396
    Note: DOI:10.3406/tiers.2003.5396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.2003.5396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/tiers_1293-8882_2003_num_44_174_5396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/tiers.2003.5396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deininger, Klaus & Binswanger, Hans, 1999. "The Evolution of the World Bank's Land Policy: Principles, Experience, and Future Challenges," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 14(2), pages 247-276, August.
    2. Michael R. Carter, 1985. "A Wisconsin Institutionalist Perspective on Microeconomic Theory of Institutions: The Insufficiency of Pareto Efficiency," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 797-813, September.
    3. Philip M. Raup, 1951. "The Wisconsin Conference on World Land Tenure Problems: Background and Setting," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 27(3), pages 205-212.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 101-128.
    6. Binswanger, Hans P. & Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 1995. "Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 42, pages 2659-2772, Elsevier.
    7. André Guichaoua, 1997. "L'évolution du marché du développement et la restructuration des organismes de coopération," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(151), pages 491-517.
    8. Carter, Michael R. & Mesbah, Dina, 1993. "Can land market reform mitigate the exclusionary aspects of rapid agro-export growth?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 1085-1100, July.
    9. Gore, Charles, 2000. "The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 789-804, May.
    10. Williamson, John, 1993. "Democracy and the "Washington consensus"," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1329-1336, August.
    11. Douglass C. North & Robert Paul Thomas, 1970. "An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Michael Lipton, 1987. "Limits of Price Policy for Agriculture: Which Way for the World Bank?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 197-215, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bardhan, Pranab & Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert, 2000. "Wealth inequality, wealth constraints and economic performance," Handbook of Income Distribution, in: A.B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (ed.), Handbook of Income Distribution, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 10, pages 541-603, Elsevier.
    2. Paul Mosley, 2001. "Attacking Poverty and the 'post-Washington consensus'," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 307-313.
    3. Leonardo A. Lanzona, 2007. "The Determination of Contracts in Agricultural Economies," Development Economics Working Papers 22641, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    4. De Alessi, Michael & Sullivan, Joseph M. & Hilborn, Ray, 2014. "The legal, regulatory, and institutional evolution of fishing cooperatives in Alaska and the West Coast of the United States," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 217-225.
    5. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    6. Erlend Krogstad, 2007. "The Post-Washington Consensus: Brand New Agenda or Old Wine in a New Bottle?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 67-85.
    7. Carter, Michael R. & Barham, Bradford L. & Mesbah, Dina & Stanley, Denise, 1993. "Agro-Exports and the Rural Resource Poor in Latin America: Policy Options for Achieving Broadly-Based Growth," Staff Papers 200571, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    8. Deepak Nayyar, 2006. "Development through Globalization?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Besley, Timothy & Leight, Jessica & Pande, Rohini & Rao, Vijayendra, 2016. "Long-run impacts of land regulation: Evidence from tenancy reform in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 72-87.
    10. Michal Lyons & Colman Titus Msoka, 2010. "The World Bank and the Street: (How) Do ‘Doing Business’ Reforms Affect Tanzania’s Micro-traders?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 1079-1097, May.
    11. Gérard Grellet & Naîma Grellet, 1999. "Développement des marchés et coûts de transaction. Une critique des politiques économiques libérales," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(157), pages 37-49.
    12. Boucher, Stephen R. & Barham, Bradford L. & Carter, Michael R., 2005. "The Impact of "Market-Friendly" Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 107-128, January.
    13. Varga, Mihai, 2022. "Getting the “basics”? The World Bank’s narrative construction of poverty reduction in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Serkan Degirmenci, 2011. "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Economic Growth and Development? The Case of Turkey," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1180, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Heath Henderson & Leonardo Corral & Eric Simning & Paul Winters, 2015. "Land Accumulation Dynamics in Developing Country Agriculture," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 743-761, June.
    16. Baker, Matthew J. & Conning, Jonathan, 2021. "The Transformations of Customary Property Regimes in Africa: An Analytical Framing," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315325, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    18. Finan, Frederico & Sadoulet, Elisabeth & de Janvry, Alain, 2005. "Measuring the poverty reduction potential of land in rural Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 27-51, June.
    19. Paul Mosley, 2004. "Institutions And Politics In A Lewis‐Type Growth Model," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 72(6), pages 751-773, December.
    20. Eric Berr & François Combarnous & Eric Rougier, 2005. "Too much consensus could be harmful : measuring the degree of implementation of the Washington consensus and its impact on economic growth," Documents de travail 116, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rtiers:tiers_1293-8882_2003_num_44_174_5396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/tiers .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.