Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Nécessité et justification

Contents:

Author Info

  • Luc Boltanski
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    [fre] Comment interpréter les relations souvent tendues qu'entretiennent l'économie et la sociologie ? Face au caractère peu convaincant des accusations qui peuvent s'échanger entre ces deux disciplines, nous proposerons l'idée suivante : sous-jacent à ces oppositions disciplinaires se trouverait un problème, tout à fait central dans les sciences sociales, qui est celui de la relation entre, d'une part, des constructions qui éloignent de leur système d'interprétation les motifs moraux et, d'autre part, des constructions qui, au contraire, leur sont attentives et entendent tenir compte de la façon dont les personnes se justifient ou, à l'inverse, se livrent à la critique. Dans cet article, nous tracerons à grands traits les lignes de partage entre différents courants des sciences sociales en fonction de ce principe de division, et nous examinerons certains des problèmes qui se posent à chacun d'eux. Nous présenterons enfin des pistes visant à rendre possible l'intégration dans un même cadre des approches qui mettent plutôt l'accent sur le poids de la nécessité et des approches qui se veulent attentives aux exigences de justification. [eng] How to understand the frequently conflicting relationships between sociology and economy? Noticing that the accusations which are exchanged from one discipline to the other are most often unconvincing, we will propose the following interpretation: underlying these oppositions one can identify a problem, which lies ai the very heart of the social sciences. This problem is related to the tensions between, on the one hand, frames of analysis which don't take into account the moral motives put forward by the actors and, on the other hand, f rames which, at the opposite, are bent on integrating the way people justify themselves or develop criticisms. In this paper, we will outline the boundaries between different programs in the social sciences, according to that scheme of interpretation, and some of the problems which they are compelled to tackle. Finally, we will propose some paths aiming at integrating into a single frame the approaches which lay stress on a compelling necessity and the approaches which whish to bring attention to the moral justifications delivered by the actors themselves.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410405
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/articleAsPDF/reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410405/reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410405.pdf?mode=light
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

    Volume (Year): 53 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 275-289

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410405

    Note: DOI:10.2307/3503099
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/reco

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_2_410405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.