IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La norme majoritaire

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Laslier

Abstract

[fre] La norme majoritaire. . Une correspondance de choix définit, en fonction des préférences individuelles, un choix unique, ou un ensemble de choix possibles. On modélise ainsi des règles de décisions, comme la règle de Borda ou la règle de Kemeny-Young, ainsi que des critères de validité, comme le critère de Pareto. Dans le cas où seulement deux options sont possibles, le principe majoritaire définit bien une correspondance de choix ; l'article étudie les correspondances de choix qui étendent le principe majoritaire au cas de plusieurs alternatives. L'analyse est essentiellement normative, mais elle peut aussi jeter quelque lumière sur certains processus politiques réels comme la compétition électorale. [eng] The majority norm. . A choice correspondence defines, given individual preferences, a unique choice, or a set of possible choices. It is a model for decision rules, such as the Borda rule or the Kemeny-Young rule, as well as for validity criteria, such as the Pareto criterion. If only two alternatives are available, the majoriarian principle defines a choice correspondence; the article surveys choice correspondences which extend the majority principle to more than two alternatives. The analysis is essentially normative but can also shed some light on real political processes such as electoral competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Laslier, 1999. "La norme majoritaire," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 50(4), pages 669-698.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410113
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoit M., 2012. "Choix social et partage équitable : Une analyse mathématique a posteriori des élections législatives et présidentielles de 2006 et 2011 en RDC [Social choice and fair sharing: An a posteriori mathe," MPRA Paper 64915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Igerseim, Herrade & Baujard, Antoinette & Laslier, Jean-François, 2016. "La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 92(1-2), pages 151-189, Mars-Juin.
    3. Etienne Farvaque & Hubert Jayet & Lionel Ragot, 2009. "A "winner" under any voting rule? An experiment on the single transferable vote," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00429725, HAL.
    4. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "Une source méconnue de la théorie de l'agrégation des jugements," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(4), pages 645-657.
    5. Isabelle Lebon & Antoinette Baujard & Frédéric Gavrel & Herrade Igersheim & Jean-François Laslier, 2016. "Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français," PSE Working Papers halshs-01409106, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.