IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_85_4_4144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investissement socialement responsable : différences entre Europe et États-Unis

Author

Listed:
  • Céline Louche
  • Steven Lydenberg

Abstract

[fre] L’article est consacré à l’évolution et aux pratiques de l’ISR aux États-Unis et en Europe. Son objet est d’étudier l’implantation historique, culturelle et politique de l’ISR. Sur la base de sources secondaires d’information, il présente une analyse comparative de l’évolution et des pratiques actuelles de l’ISR des deux côtés de l’Atlantique et examine les futures implications de l’ISR. L’article montre que les mouvements ISR dans les deux régions présentent quelques différences dans leurs définitions, leurs acteurs, leur langage, leurs motivations et les stratégies mises en oeuvre. Cependant, elles partagent également un projet fondamental commun et les mêmes objectifs d’améliorer les politiques des grandes entreprises et les pratiques dans les domaines du social et de l’environnement. . Classification JEL : G11, G23, M14, Q01 [eng] Socially Responsible Investment : differences between Europe and United States . The paper focuses on the development and practices of SRI in the United States and Europe. The aim is to explore the historical, cultural and political embeddedness of SRI. Based on second sources of information, it offers a comparative analysis of the development and current practices of SRI on both sides of the Atlantic and discuss the future implications for SRI. The paper shows that SRI movements in both regions present some differences in terms of definitions, actors involved, vocabulary and motivations, and strategies implemented. However they also share a common underlying purpose and seeking similar goals of improving corporations’ policies and practices on social and environmental issues. . JEL classification : G11, G23, M14, Q01

Suggested Citation

  • Céline Louche & Steven Lydenberg, 2006. "Investissement socialement responsable : différences entre Europe et États-Unis," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 85(4), pages 81-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_85_4_4144
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2006.4144
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2006.4144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2006.4144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_85_4_4144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2006.4144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darlene Himick & Sophie Audousset-Coulier, 2016. "Responsible Investing of Pension Assets: Links between Framing and Practices for Evaluation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 539-556, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2006_num_85_4_4144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.