A Note on the Bias in Herfindahl-Type Measures Based on Count Data
Abstract
[fre] Un indice d'Herfindhal comptant par définition un nombre de parts relatives s'avère biaisé à la baisse dès que ce nombre est trop faible du fait des propriétés statistiques du nombre de données comptées et de l'inégalité de Jensen. Cette note propose une correction simple de ce biais, ainsi qu'une illustration qui applique cette méthode dans le contexte de données de brevets et de citations de brevets. [eng] A Herfindahl index of constructed from shares based on count data where the number of counts is small will generally be biased downward because of the statistical properties of count data and Jensen's inequality. This note suggests a simple correction for the bias and illustrates its applicability when using measures based on patent data and patent citation data.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue d'économie industrielle.
Volume (Year): 110 (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 149-156
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_2005_num_110_1_3076
Note: DOI:10.3406/rei.2005.3076
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/rei
For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).
Related research
Keywords:References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- David E. Giles, 2005. "The Bias of Inequality Measures in Very Small Samples: Some Analytic Results," Econometrics Working Papers 0514, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_2005_num_110_1_3076For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

