IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1983_num_158_1_4779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmenter l'impôt sur le revenu : des mesures de portée inégale

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Coutière

Abstract

[fre] Augmenter l'impôt sur le revenu des mesures de portée inégale . Antoine Coutière . Les Français — c'est bien connu — payent beaucoup moins d'impôt sur le les Allemands, les Anglais ou les Américains. La situation française s'écarte de des pays comparables sur plusieurs points : le poids des cotisations sociales des entreprises est plus fort; les revenus salariaux bénéficient d'une double déduction forfaitaire, de 10 % pour frais professionnels, de 20 % pour « amortissement du humain »; le barème comprend des tranches à taux bas. A titre d'exercice fictif, on peut imaginer que l'on supprime simultanément l'ensemble de ces particularités; l'effet direct est alors la réduction des cotisations sociales et le de l'impôt sur le revenu sans que le revenu disponible global des ménages modifié, ni que les coûts salariaux des entreprises ne soient augmentés. D'autres mesures auraient des effets moins importants sur le montant de une meilleure connaissance des revenus non salariaux, avec éventuellement la en question du régime des forfaits; des majorations ne touchant que les les plus aisés; le réexamen de la déductibilité de certaines charges. Dans le domaine de la famille, les systèmes des différents pays sont très ne fournissent pas de référence incontestable. Le système français révèle une cohérence certaine, si l'on combine les dispositions fiscales et les prestations Il paraît difficile de prétendre se rapprocher, à cet égard, d'une « moyenne » partenaires qui n'aurait guère de sens. [eng] How to raise taxes on income Measures with unequal effects - The French, it is well known, pay much less direct tax on income than say the Germans, the British or the Americans. The French situation is different from other comparable countries in several ways : the weight of the firm's contribution to social security payments is higher than elsewhere, salaried income benefits from a double set deduction, a first 10 % for professional costs, and an additional 20 % for "depreciation of human capital. " The grill also includes tranches for low rates. As a purely imaginative exercise, one could do away with all these arrangements. The direct effect would be the reduction of social security monthly payments and the doubling of direct taxes on incomes, without the global level of incomes of each household diminishing, and without the salary costs of firms rising. Other measures would have less important effects on the level of taxes : such as if we knew more about the non-salaried incomes or the effects of the modification of the system of tax forfaits; the same could be said of tax increases that touched only the wealthiest members of society, or the reexamination of certain deduction categories. Concerning the family deductions and subsidies, different countries have different systems, and they cannot really be compared or one used as an index. The French system has a certain coherence, if one looks at fiscal measures and family subsidies together. It would appear to be difficult to arrive at an „ average " position on family deductions and subsidies among " industrial countries „ as that does not really have the same sense everywhere. [spa] Incrementar el impuesto sobre la renta : medidas de desigual alcance - Los Franceses — es harto conocido — pagan mucho menos impuesto sobre la renta que los Alemanes, Ingleses o Americanos. La situación francesa se aparta de la de los países comparables en diversos puntos : la carga de las cuotas de la Seguridad social de las empresas es más elevada; los ingresos salariales se benefician de una doble deducción a tanto alzado, de un 10 % por gastos profesionales, de un 20 % por « amortización del capital humano »; la tabla comprende grupos de tasa baja. En concepto de ejercicio meramente ficticio, puede uno imaginarse que se suprime simultáneamente el con junto de dichas peculiaridades; el efecto directo es, entonces, la aminoración de las cuotas sociales y la duplicación impositiva sobre la renta sin que el ingreso disponible global de los hogares esté modificado ni que los costes salariales de las empresas sufran incremento. Otras medidas surtirían efectos de menor importancia en el importe del impuesto : un mejor conocimiento de los ingresos no salariales, con, eventual mente, la puesta a debate del régimen de un tanto alzado; aumentos que afectan tan solo a los contribuyentes mas acomodados; un nuevo examen de lo que pudiere deducirse de algunas cargas. En el terreno familiar, los sistemas de los diversos países son sumanente variables y no facilitan ninguna referencia indiscutible. El sistema francés revela una coherencia segura, si se combinan las disposiciones fiscales y los subsidios familiares. Parece difficil pretender aproximarse sobre el particular a una « media » propia de nuestros coparticipes.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Coutière, 1983. "Augmenter l'impôt sur le revenu : des mesures de portée inégale," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 158(1), pages 21-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1983_num_158_1_4779
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1983.4779
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1983.4779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1983.4779
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1983_num_158_1_4779
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1983.4779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1983_num_158_1_4779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.