Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Comparaisons de distributions hétérogènes et critères de dominance

Contents:

Author Info

  • Patrick Moyes

Abstract

[eng] Comparisons of Heterogeneous Distributions and dominance Criteria . by Patrick Moyes . This paper looks at standard-of-living comparisons when observations of both income and household structure are available. We generalise the Atkinson and Bourguignon approach (1987) in the case where marginal distributions of needs can vary across the household populations studied. We assume that considerate planners use a utilitarian social welfare function to rank heterogeneous income distributions. Insofar as any individual can play the role of planner, we take the unanimist point of view that the planner's judgements have to comply with a certain number of basic normative principles. We impose increasingly restrictive conditions on the household's utility function and study their effects on the resulting ranking of distributions. This leads us to propose four dominance criteria to be used for an unambiguous ranking of income distributions for heterogeneous populations. [fre] Comparaisons de distributions hétérogènes et critères de dominance . par Patrick Moyes . Cet article porte sur la comparaison des niveaux de vie lorsque l'on dispose à la fois d'observations sur les revenus et sur la composition des ménages. Nous généralisons l'approche d'Atkinson et Bourguignon (1987) dans le cas où les distributions marginales des besoins peuvent varier entre les populations des ménages considérées. Nous supposons que le planificateur bienveillant a recours à une fonction de bien-être social utilitariste pour classer les distributions de revenus hétérogènes. Dans la mesure où tout individu peut jouer le rôle du planificateur, nous adopterons le point de vue unanimiste suivant lequel les jugements du planificateur doivent se conformer à un certain nombre de principes normatifs élémentaires. Nous imposons des conditions de plus en plus restrictives sur la fonction d'utilité du ménage et examinons leurs conséquences sur le classement des distributions qui en résulte. Ceci nous conduit à proposer quatre critères de dominance permettant de classer sans ambiguïté les distributions de revenu pour des populations hétérogènes.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.3406/ecop.1999.5963
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://www.persee.fr/articleAsPDF/ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963/ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963.pdf?mode=light
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

Volume (Year): 138 (1999)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 125-146

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963

Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1999.5963
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/ecop

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Erwin Ooghe & Peter J. Lambert, 2005. "On Bounded Dominance Criteria," University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers 2005-6, University of Oregon Economics Department, revised 01 May 2005.
  2. Gajdos, Thibault & Weymark, John A., 2012. "Introduction to inequality and risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(4), pages 1313-1330.
  3. Ooghe, Erwin, 2007. "Sequential dominance and weighted utilitarianism," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 208-212, February.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.