IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_135_4_5928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Étude empirique de l'influence sociale dans les phénomènes de diffusion : l'exemple du câble et du fax en France

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Steyer
  • Jean-Benoît Zimmermann

Abstract

[eng] Empirical Study of Social Influence in Diffusion Phenomena - Cable and Fax in France by Alexandre Steyer and Jean-Benoît Zimmermann . Over the last ten years, diffusion models have been improved by including network externalities. We briefly outline the main approaches developed to date and describe the basis of an approach to take account of different interindividual influences in a population. We then present an empirical validation based on two contemporary examples in France. The first is cable television, which is expected to present social utility via mimetic effects. The second example is the fax, which presents strong interindividual externalities. Its utility stems from the possibility for players to use it to communicate with their contacts. [fre] Étude empirique de l'influence sociale dans les phénomènes de diffusion : . l'exemple du câble et du fax en France . par Alexandre Steyer et Jean-Benoît Zimmermann . Les modèles de diffusion se sont enrichis depuis une dizaine d'années par la prise en compte des effets d'externalités de réseau. Après un rapide survol des principales approches développées jusqu'ici, nous exposons les fondements d'une démarche visant à intégrer la différenciation de l'influence interindividuelle au sein d'une population. Nous présentons ensuite un travail de validation empirique sur deux exemples contemporains, en France. Le premier concerne la télévision par câble. Ce produit présente a priori une utilité sociale par effet de mimétisme. Le deuxième exemple concerne le fax. Ce produit comporte de fortes externalités interindividuelles. Son utilité dérive pour l'essentiel de la possibilité pour un agent de communiquer par ce moyen avec les personnes avec lesquelles il est en relation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Steyer & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 1998. "Étude empirique de l'influence sociale dans les phénomènes de diffusion : l'exemple du câble et du fax en France," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 135(4), pages 109-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_135_4_5928
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1998.5928
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1998.5928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1998.5928
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_135_4_5928
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1998.5928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    2. Alexandre Steyer & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 1996. "Externalités de réseau et adoption d'un standard dans une structure résiliaire," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(1), pages 67-90.
    3. Alan Kirman, 1999. "Interaction and markets," Chapters, in: Mauro Gallegati & Alan Kirman (ed.), Beyond the Representative Agent, chapter 1, pages 1-44, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Alan P. Kirman, 1992. "Variety : the coexistence of techniques," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 59(1), pages 62-74.
    5. Kapur, Sandeep, 1995. "Technological Diffusion with Social Learning," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 173-195, June.
    6. Steyer, A & Zimmermann, J-B, 1997. "On the Frontier : Structural Effects in a Diffusion Model Based on Influence Matrixes," G.R.E.Q.A.M. 97a14, Universite Aix-Marseille III.
    7. Cowan, Robin, 1991. "Tortoises and Hares: Choice among Technologies of Unknown Merit," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(407), pages 801-814, July.
    8. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cantono, Simona, 2012. "Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201222, University of Turin.
    2. Emanuele Giovannetti & Mohsen Hamoudia, 2022. "The interaction between direct and indirect network externalities in the early diffusion of mobile social networking," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 617-642, December.
    3. Deroian, Frederic, 2002. "Formation of social networks and diffusion of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 835-846, July.
    4. Theoharakis Vasilis & Vakratsas Demetrios & Wong Veronica, 2004. "The Relationship between Market Share and Information in a High-Tech Industry," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. John Kemp & Ted Wilson, 1999. "Monetary Regime Transformation: The scramble to gold in the late nineteenth century," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 125-149.
    6. Comin, Diego & Rode, Johannes, 2013. "From Green Users to Green Voters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63678, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Robin Cowan & William Cowan & G.M. Peter Swann, 2004. "Waves in consumption with interdependence among consumers," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 149-177, February.
    8. Chen, Huayi & Ma, Tieju, 2017. "Optimizing systematic technology adoption with heterogeneous agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 287-296.
    9. Harison, Elad & Koski, Heli, 2006. "Innovative Software Business Strategies: Evidence from Finnish Firms," Discussion Papers 1042, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    10. Andrea Marchini & Chiara Riganelli & Francesco Diotallevi & Bianca Polenzani, 2021. "Label information and consumer behaviour: evidence on drinking milk sector," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2022. "A multi-level optimization model of infrastructure-dependent technology adoption: Overcoming the chicken-and-egg problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 755-770.
    12. Marc R.H. Roedenbeck & Barnas Nothnagel, 2007. "Rethinking Lock-in and Locking: Adopters Facing Network Effects," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(1), pages 1-4.
    13. Ruutu, Sampsa & Casey, Thomas & Kotovirta, Ville, 2017. "Development and competition of digital service platforms: A system dynamics approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 119-130.
    14. Bronwyn H. Hall, 2004. "Innovation and Diffusion," NBER Working Papers 10212, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Geroski, P. A., 2000. "Models of technology diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 603-625, April.
    16. Zakaria Babutsidze, 2011. "Returns to product promotion when consumers are learning how to consume," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 783-801, December.
    17. Michihiro, Kandori & Rob, Rafael, 1998. "Bandwagon Effects and Long Run Technology Choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 30-60, January.
    18. Mira Frick & Yuhta Ishii, 2015. "Innovation Adoption by Forward-Looking Social Learners," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1877, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    19. Gary Biglaiser & Jacques Crémer & André Veiga, 2020. "Migration between Platforms," CESifo Working Paper Series 8185, CESifo.
    20. Andy Stirling & Sue Mayer, 2001. "A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multicriteria Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 529-555, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_135_4_5928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.