Comparison of the Czech regions in the light of the realization of the Interreg IIIA programme on their territory
AbstractThe paper deals with the comparison of the Czech regions in the light of the realization of the Interreg programme on their territory. Th e author uses five comparative criteria (number of submitted project applications, number of realized projects, amount of coff ers in co-financing contracts, aim of realized projects and classifi cation according to the type of the subject/applicant). The survey shows that there are quite a wide range of diff erences among the Czech regions. On the basis of ?multicriteria? comparison the identifi cation of several possible causes of diff erentiation is given. As regards the view of subject (applicant) the author distinguishes external and internal reasons (concrete and abstract). To the external causes belong size of allocated coff ers and size of subsidy territory and programme contents. Availability of coff ers, quality of human capital, experience with pre-accesion programs of the EU and activity of euroregions come under internal reasons.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Economics, Prague in its journal Regionální studia.
Volume (Year): 2008 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Postal: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Katedra regionálních studií, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vaclav Subrta).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.