IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcbr/v2013y2013i3id52p30-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Corporate Governance Debate on Professional Ethics in the Accounting Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Giorgiana Bonaci
  • Jiří Strouhal
  • Libuše Müllerová
  • Jaroslava Roubíčková

Abstract

This paper focuses on the particular case of professional ethics in the context of the accounting profession. After briefly discussing recent events that made us reconsider our understanding of corporate governance, accountancy and ethics, we attempt to delimit the state of the art by looking at ethics from the accounting profession's perspective. When aiming to clarify professional ethics, we closely analyze integrity based on the latest developments undertaken by European professional bodies. The findings are used in identifying ways to contribute to the endeavor of aligning the profession's performance with society's reasonable expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Giorgiana Bonaci & Jiří Strouhal & Libuše Müllerová & Jaroslava Roubíčková, 2013. "The Corporate Governance Debate on Professional Ethics in the Accounting Profession," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(3), pages 30-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2013:y:2013:i:3:id:52:p:30-35
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.52.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.52.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cebr.52?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walker, Martin, 2010. "Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set of global accounting standards," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 137-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luboš Smrčka & Jaroslav Schönfeld, 2014. "Several Conclusions from Research of Insolvency Cases in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 13-19.
    2. Robert Huterski & Grazyna Voss & Agnieszka Huterska, 2020. "Professional Ethics in Accounting as Assessed by Managers of Economic Units," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 720-731.
    3. Inka Neumaierová & Ivan Neumaier, 2014. "INFA Performance Indicator Diagnostic System," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 35-41.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Macve Richard, 2013. "“Trading Places”: A UK (and IFRS) Comment," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 27-40, April.
    2. Anthony D. Miller & David Oldroyd, 2018. "An Economics Perspective on Financial Reporting Objectives," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 104-108, March.
    3. La Torre, Matteo & Dumay, John & Rea, Michele Antonio & Abhayawansa, Subhash, 2020. "A journey towards a safe harbour: The rhetorical process of the International Integrated Reporting Council," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    4. Nölke Andreas, 2013. "A Political Economy Explanation for Country Variation in IFRS Adoption – A Comment on ‘The International Politics of IFRS Harmonization’ by K. Ramanna," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-8, January.
    5. Inesa IACOB, 2014. "Fair-Value Accounting – Between Innovation And Need," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 23(1), pages 91-98.
    6. Federica Doni & Ross Taplin & Roberto Verona, 2016. "Comparability of Company Accounts Using IFRS and US GAAP: Empirical Evidence of European and US Financial Statements," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-54, November.
    7. Esther Pittroff, 2021. "The legitimacy of global accounting rules: a note on the challenges from path-dependence theory," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 379-396, June.
    8. da Silva, Ricardo Luiz Menezes & Nardi, Paula Carolina Ciampaglia, 2017. "Full adoption of IFRSs in Brazil: Earnings quality and the cost of equity capital," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1057-1073.
    9. Christoph Kuhner & Christoph Pelger, 2015. "On the Relationship of Stewardship and Valuation—An Analytical Viewpoint," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(3), pages 379-411, September.
    10. Allan Hodgson & Mark Russell, 2014. "Comprehending Comprehensive Income," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(2), pages 100-110, June.
    11. Aust, Viktoria & Pelger, Christoph & Drefahl, Christian, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between valuation and stewardship uses of accounting information: Empirical evidence from German listed firms," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    12. Macve, R.H., 2015. "Fair value vs conservatism? Aspects of the history of accounting, auditing, business and finance from ancient Mesopotamia to modern China," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 124-141.
    13. Giner Inchausti, Begoña, 2014. "Instituciones e intereses en conflicto ante la regulación contable internacional: el caso del sector financiero español," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 143-152.
    14. Rutherford, Brian A., 2013. "A genre-theoretic approach to financial reporting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 297-310.
    15. Begoña Giner & Francisca Pardo, 2015. "How Ethical are Managers’ Goodwill Impairment Decisions in Spanish-Listed Firms?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 21-40, November.
    16. Joseph P.H. Fan & Feng Guan & Zengquan Li & Yong George Yang, 2014. "Relationship Networks and Earnings Informativeness: Evidence from Corruption Cases," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7-8), pages 831-866, September.
    17. Ann Jorissen & Ronita Ram & Pedro Moraya Barros, 2022. "Are IFRS Standards a ‘trusted’ language for private firm credit decisions? An analysis of country differences in users’ perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 3021-3065, June.
    18. Gregory Waymire & Sudipta Basu, 2011. "Economic crisis and accounting evolution," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 207-232, August.
    19. Palea, Vera & Biancone, Paolo Pietro, 2017. "Which Accounting Rules for Economic and Social Sustainable Development? Engaging Critically with IFRS Adoption in the EU," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201733, University of Turin.
    20. Tyson, Thomas N. & Oldroyd, David & Fleischman, Richard K., 2013. "Was America born capitalist? A counter view," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 379-396.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business ethics; accounting profession; auditing; code of ethics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2013:y:2013:i:3:id:52:p:30-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.