This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Some Consideration Regarding Membership of the Constitutional Court of Romania

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
DANIELA CRISTINA VALEA () (Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Science, „Petru Maior” University of Tîrgu-Mures, Romania)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Romania was considering an innovation in the Romanian constitutional system. The Events in 1989 December ended the Communist dictatorship in Romania and allowed the re-establishment of democracy. And a strong negative reaction towards the totalitarian regime has been manifested as well. Therefore the principles, mechanisms and guarantees of the rule of law and democratic state are not missing from the new Constitution. One of these guarantees is the control of the constitutionality of the laws (and of the government ordinances) which has been reintroduced. But the Romanian Constitution-maker of 1991 gave up to the traditional form of the control of constitutionality, concentrated, exercised by the supreme court, and chose the “European model”, respectively a system of the control of constitutionality transferred to a Constitutional Court, specialized body, organized only for this purpose, and not as part of the judiciary power. The author of this paper briefly presents the most significant aspects about the membership of the Constitutional Court of Romania. The Constitutional Court of Romania is made up of 9 judges, appointed for 9 years of office which cannot be extended or renewed. The appointment on position is made as follows: 3 judges are appointed by the President of Romania; 3 judges by the Deputies Chamber; and 3 judges by the Senate (The Superior Chamber of the Parliament). The Constitution and the law establish the constitutional judges responsibility

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/rcj08/recjurid083_47F.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

Volume (Year): 3-4 (2008)
Issue (Month): (December)
Pages: 102-117
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:pmu:journl:v:3-4:y:2008:p:102-117

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas).

Related research
Keywords: Constitutional Court; Judges; Appointment; Responsibility;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.