Nelu Dorinel POPA () (Police Inspectorate of Mures County, Romania)
Abstract
Several points of view about the term “material object of the offence” have been explained in the doctrine, which has led to the birth of a series of categories of this concept as general object, general social object, generic social object, direct object (immediate), juridical object, material object, etcetera. The above mentioned terms are frequently used, by different authors with different meanings. In an objective approach of offence it was considered that its structure consists primarily of a system of relationships between the subject and the object, between which interdependence arises, interdependence which marks a unity and which materialises into a deed. From the point of view of subjective law, the individual will of a person who always longs for an object stands out. A present-day re-evaluation of this concept is necessary under the circumstances in which there are several formal infractions which are void of a material object but which can nevertheless generate material consequences.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.