IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v57y2014p137-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice Of Insolvency Regime In Hybrid Proceeding By Entrepreneuers

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas MORAVEC

    (Assistant in Department of Business and European law, University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of International Relations, junior practicing lawyer in business and insolvency law.)

Abstract

The paper examines the possibility to change insolvency status through hybrid insolvency proceeding. The main problem of European insolvency law is that hybrid proceeding is not regulated. The EU proposal of insolvency regulation has included into its scope hybrid proceeding in opt-out way. So the paper also focuses on the possibility to change insolvency status in the proposal. The paper is based on factual analysis of legislation and structural analysis of judicature. The paper shows effective ways of changing insolvency status and the legal uncertainty concerning this change. Furthermore, the paper confirms the hypothesis that the regulation of hybrid proceeding is needed and proposes ways of regulation. Moreover, the outcomes of paper could be used by other subjects such as judges, lawyers and entrepreneurs. The paper does not involve the economic impact of proposed regulation on the EU and member states, which could be a suggestion for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas MORAVEC, 2014. "The Choice Of Insolvency Regime In Hybrid Proceeding By Entrepreneuers," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 57, pages 137-147, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:57:y:2014:p:137-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid142_13F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regulation; Pre-Insolvency proceeding; COMI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:57:y:2014:p:137-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.