IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v54y2013p50-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le Systeme De L’Injonction D’Eloignement En Autriche

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Noemi TOTH

    (Universite de Debrecen (Hongrie), Departement de la procedure penale.)

Abstract

All protective order statutes permit the court to instruct the abuser to stay away from someone, their home, their workplace or their school and to not contact them. Victims generally may also ask the court to order that all contact, whether it be by telephone, notes, mail, fax, email or delivery of flowers or gifts, be prohibited. In Hungary, the protection order is one of the emergency provisions, and it means restriction of freedom of movement. The model for the Hungarian legislative power was the system of Austria, where the legal institution has an effective function. We can find the emergency barring order by the police, the protection orders by the Civil Court, and since 1976, women’s organizations and women politicians have built a network of services supporting women. We can see an overall system during the procedure, which can be a model for every pays.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Noemi TOTH, 2013. "Le Systeme De L’Injonction D’Eloignement En Autriche," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 54, pages 50-54, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:54:y:2013:p:50-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj13/recjurid133_6F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    protection order; emergency barring order by the police; network of services supporting women; Austria; Hungary.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:54:y:2013:p:50-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.