Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Considerations On The Judiciary Procedures Of Conflict Resolution


Author Info


    (Assistant professor, PhD., „Romanian American” University, Bucharest, ROMANIA.)

Registered author(s):


    As a result of the economic and social life development, which triggers an ever larger number of litigations in all the fields, and which have to be solved at an ever faster pace, at the level of the European Union, it is incumbent to find the simplest and quickest judiciary procedures, the European Union member states having to adopt them. The practice showed that the judiciary procedure through which the creditors became to have their rights acknowledged and ask for the pursuance and execution of their debts is, many times, discouraging, it is much more expensive and it takes an extremely long time. The demand for payment is meant, on the one hand, to place the creditor in a much more comfortable position, as compared to his rights, and, on the other hand, to reduce, to a considerable extent, the length of valorization of an uncontested, liquid and enforceable debt, consisting in paying an amount of currency.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 47 (2011)
    Issue (Month): (December)
    Pages: 237-246

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:237-246

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: special procedure; demand for payment; uncontested debt; liquid debt; enforceable debt; petition for annulment.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:237-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.