IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v22-23y2005p10-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of the main problems raised by de emergency ordinances of the Romanian and Italian law systems

Author

Listed:
  • CORINA ALEXANDRA VITELAR

    ("Pro Iure" Foundation, Tirgu-Mures, Romania)

Abstract

In this article the goal was to present some of the most important problems raised by the governmental emergency acts in the Romanian and Italian law systems. The question at hand is difficult and raises questions to witch it is difficult, if not impossible, finding an answer. The article presents the fundamental conditions the government needs to respect in order to adopt such an act. These conditions bind the executive to respect a strict and legal regime making impossible, at least in theory to commit abuses. One of the most important conditions is the existence on an extraordinary case to justify such an act. Unfortunately, the phrase leaves room to controversy and can lead to misunderstandings so it is important to see how the meaning of these phrase it’s understood, not only in the opinion of jurists from Romania, but also in another law system, similar but not quite with our law system.

Suggested Citation

  • Corina Alexandra Vitelar, 2005. "A comparative study of the main problems raised by de emergency ordinances of the Romanian and Italian law systems," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 22, pages 10-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:22-23:y:2005:p:10-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj05/recjurid053_42F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Emergency Ordinances; Conditions; Italian Law; Law Systems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:22-23:y:2005:p:10-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.