The siting problem of NIMBY facilities: cost -- benefit analysis and auction mechanisms
AbstractIn this paper the authors discuss the characteristics of NIMBY ('not in my backyard') facilities as they relate to the impacts on the local neighbourhood. They evaluate the available conflict-resolution instruments used for the siting of NIMBY facilities, and in particular aim to suggest two alternative auction mechanisms for localities affected by these facilities. Some considerations for general compensation schemes are also presented. Here, efficiency and some cost -- benefit rules for compensation are suggested. Finally, some equity concerns are discussed.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Pion Ltd, London in its journal Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.
Volume (Year): 16 (1998)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.pion.co.uk
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Fischbeck, Paul & Vajjhala, Shalini, 2006.
"Quantifying Siting Difficulty: A Case Study of U.S. Transmission Line Siting,"
dp-06-03, Resources For the Future.
- Vajjhala, Shalini P. & Fischbeck, Paul S., 2007. "Quantifying siting difficulty: A case study of US transmission line siting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 650-671, January.
- Shackley, Simon & Mander, Sarah & Reiche, Alexander, 2006. "Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3423-3433, December.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.