A complex network approach to urban growth
AbstractEconomic geography can be viewed as a large and growing network of interacting activities. This fundamental network structure and the large size of such systems makes the complex network approach an attractive model for growth dynamics modeling. In this paper the authors propose the use of complex networks for geographical modeling and demonstrate how such an application can be combined with a cellular model to produce output that is consistent with large-scale regularities such as power laws and fractality. Complex networks can provide a stringent framework for growth dynamic modeling where concepts from, for example, spatial interaction models and multiplicative growth models, can be combined with the flexible representation of land and behaviour found in cellular automata and agent-based models. In addition, there exists a large body of theory for the analysis of complex networks that have direct applications in urban geographic problems. The intended use of such models is twofold: (1) to address the problem of how the empirically observed hierarchical structure of settlements can be explained as a stationary property of a stochastic evolutionary process rather than as equilibrium points in a dynamic process, and, (2) to improve the predictive quality of applied urban modeling.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Pion Ltd, London in its journal Environment and Planning A.
Volume (Year): 38 (2006)
Issue (Month): 10 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.pion.co.uk
Other versions of this item:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Robert Axtell and Richard Florida, 2001. "Emergent Cities: A Microeconomic Explanation for Zipf's Law," Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 154, Society for Computational Economics.
- Kaizoji, Taisei, 2003.
"Scaling behavior in land markets,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,
Elsevier, vol. 326(1), pages 256-264.
- William J. Reed, 2002. "On the Rank-Size Distribution for Human Settlements," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-17.
- Andersson, Claes & Hellervik, Alexander & Lindgren, Kristian, 2005. "A spatial network explanation for a hierarchy of urban power laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 227-244.
- J.V. Henderson, 1972.
"The Sizes and Types of Cities,"
75, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
- Claes Andersson & Steen Rasmussen & Roger White, 2002. "Urban settlement transitions," Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 29(6), pages 841-865, November.
- Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen, 2003. "Rethinking the "New' Geographical Economics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 637-648.
- Rosen, Kenneth T. & Resnick, Mitchel, 1980. "The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 165-186, September.
- Paul Krugman, 1990.
"Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,"
NBER Working Papers
3275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Y Ioannides & Henry Overman, 2000.
"Zipfs Law for Cities: An Empirical Examination,"
CEP Discussion Papers
dp0484, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- S. Redner, 1998. "How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution," The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 131-134, July.
- Xavier Gabaix, 1999. "Zipf'S Law For Cities: An Explanation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 114(3), pages 739-767, August.
- Emily M. Jin & Michelle Girvan & M. E. J. Newman, 2001. "The Structure of Growing Social Networks," Working Papers 01-06-032, Santa Fe Institute.
- Ergün, G. & Rodgers, G.J., 2002. "Growing random networks with fitness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 261-272.
- Barabási, Albert-László & Albert, Réka & Jeong, Hawoong, 1999. "Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 173-187.
- L Sanders & D Pumain & H Mathian & F Gu�rin-Pace & S Bura, 1997. "SIMPOP: a multiagent system for the study of urbanism," Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 24(2), pages 287-305, March.
- repec:ner:lselon:http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/583/ is not listed on IDEAS
- Dendrinos, Dimitrios S & Rosser, J Barkley, Jr, 1992. "Fundamental Issues in Nonlinear Urban Population Dynamic Models: Theory and a Synthesis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 135-45, June.
- Nijkamp Peter, 2012.
"Behaviour of Humans and Behaviour of Models in Dynamic Space,"
De Gruyter, vol. 31(2), pages 7-19, June.
- Peter Nijkamp, 2011. "Behaviour of Humans and Behaviour of Models in Dynamic Space," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-105/3, Tinbergen Institute.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.