IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v6y1966i2p243-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Refinements of the Semi-Input-Output Method

Author

Listed:
  • J. TINBERGEN

    (Netherlands School)

Abstract

The semi-input-output method has been proposed by the author as a substitute for what was formerly called the estimation of the indirect effects of investment projects. Essentially it rests on assumption I that a country must aim at an "ideal development process", meaning a growth process which at no time shows unutilized production capacity. Furthermore, the method rests on assumption II that a distinction can be made between national or domestic activities (industries in the widest sense or sectors) on the one hand and international activities on the other hand. By definition the products of the former cannot, for technological or cultural reasons, be imported or exported. Examples have been given elsewhere [1].

Suggested Citation

  • J. Tinbergen, 1966. "Some Refinements of the Semi-Input-Output Method," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 243-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:6:y:1966:i:2:p:243-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1966/Volume2/243-247.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hewings, Geoffrey J D & Jensen, Rodney C, 1988. "Emerging Challenges in Regional Input-Output Analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 22(0), pages 43-53, February.
    2. Clive Bell & Shantayanan Devarajan, 1979. "Towards a Synthesis of Semi-Input-Output and Little-Mirrlees: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis with Multiplier Effects of An Irrigation Project in Northwest Malaysia," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 165-185.
    3. Clive Bell, 2017. "Project appraisal: A revival is long overdue," WIDER Working Paper Series 111, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:6:y:1966:i:2:p:243-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.