IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v37y1998i1p53-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Seed Cotton and Wheat Marketing Chains in Sindh

Author

Listed:
  • Hari Ram Lohano

    (Sindh Development Studies Centre, Sindh University.)

  • Laurence E.D. Smith

    (Wye College, University of London.)

  • Mike Stockbridge

    (Independent Consultant based in the United Kingdom.)

Abstract

This paper contrasts the operation of seed cotton and wheat marketing systems in Sindh. Analysis of marketing margins indicates that the private sector cotton marketing chain appears to be working efficiently, given the many adverse aspects of its socioeconomic environment. There is evidence that higher domestic prices resulting from alignment with world markets have been transmitted through the marketing chain to producers, and that production has increased. In contrast to cotton, the government continues to be heavily involved in wheat procurement and storage, with private traders usually acting as intermediaries between the Food Department and the grower. Despite expensive involvement of the same private traders as in cotton, the wheat market is characterised by bureaucratic failure and rent-seeking behaviour, leading to stagnation of incentives and production. For cotton, the primary recommendations are to sustain liberalisation of the market and to support the developing beneficial model of private competition through improvements in communications and transport infrastructure. The practical means to improve the grading of cotton lint and seed cotton should also be developed and promoted to provide incentives for higher quality output. For wheat, the main recommendations are to liberalise farmgate prices, reduce the state’s role in procurement, and privatise government godowns. Research is needed on how this might best be achieved, with attention to the conditions necessary for private financing of storage activities, and to ways of minimising price and supply fluctuations. The impact of higher flour prices on poor consumers also needs to be addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hari Ram Lohano & Laurence E.D. Smith & Mike Stockbridge, 1998. "Comparing the Seed Cotton and Wheat Marketing Chains in Sindh," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 53-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:37:y:1998:i:1:p:53-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1998/Volume1/53-75.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alderman, Harold, 1988. "The twilight of flour rationing in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 245-256, August.
    2. Cornelisse, Peter A. & Naqvi, Syed Nawab Haider, 1989. "An appraisal of wheat market policy in Pakistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 409-419, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Briones Alonso & Johan Swinnen, 2015. "A Value Chain Approach to Measuring Distortions to Incentives and Food Policy Effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy)," Working Papers id:6895, eSocialSciences.
    2. Ashley Gorst & Ben Groom & Ali Dehlavi, 2015. "Crop productivity and adaptation to climate change in Pakistan," GRI Working Papers 189, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    3. Briones Alonso, Elena & Swinnen, Johan, 2016. "Who are the producers and consumers? Value chains and food policy effects in the wheat sector in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 40-58.
    4. Akhter Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2017. "Farmers' Access to Markets: The Case of Cotton in Pakistan," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-232, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2002. "Poverty in Bangladesh : Building on Progress," World Bank Publications - Reports 15303, The World Bank Group.
    2. Rinku Murgai & Salman Zaidi, 2005. "Effectiveness of Food Assistance Programs in Bangladesh," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 121-142, June.
    3. Muhammad Ahsan Rana & Muhammad Nadeem Malik, 2021. "Friendly Fire: Wheat Subsidy in Punjab, Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 153-174.
    4. Takashi Kurosaki, 1996. "Government Interventions, Market Integration, and Price Risk in Pakistan’s Punjab," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 129-144.
    5. Ejaz Ghani, 1998. "The Wheat Pricing Policies in Pakistan: Some Alternative Options," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 149-166.
    6. Mushtaq Klasra, 2009. "Cointegration, causality and the transmission of shocks across wheat market in Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 305-315, March.
    7. Islam, Yassir & Garrett, James L., 1997. "IFPRI and the abolition of the wheat flour ration shops in Pakistan: a case-study on policymaking and the use and impact of research," Impact assessments 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Mehta, Aashish & Jha, Shikha, 2014. "Pilferage from opaque food subsidy programs: Theory and evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 69-79.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:37:y:1998:i:1:p:53-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.