IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v9i3y2009p121-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polycentricity and Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelian Ionuţ Ceauşescu

    („Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Tg.-Jiu, Romania)

Abstract

The new European political target to reduce development disparities and a more appropriate distribution of development funds within regions. In the ESPON (European Spatial Planning Observation Network) since 2006 there have been studies on policentricity. They support the idea that a polycentric urban structure with a more marked character will contribute to more balanced regional development and to increase European competitiveness. However, studies fail ESPON overlap and a common approach to the two concepts, polycentricity and regional competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelian Ionuţ Ceauşescu, 2009. "Polycentricity and Regional Development," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 9(3), pages 121-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:3:y:2009:p:121-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2009/20090313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello, 2000. "The City Network Paradigm: Measuring Urban Network Externalities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 1925-1945, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naoki FUJIWARA, 2019. "International City Network and Public-Private Cooperation Japanese Public Water Services’ Overseas Expansion," CIRIEC Working Papers 1909, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    2. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    3. José Miguel Navarro-Azorín & Andrés Artal-Tur, 2017. "How much does urban location matter for growth?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 298-313, February.
    4. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    5. Yang, Xiaolan & Wang, Rui & Guo, Dongmei & Sun, Weizeng, 2020. "The reconfiguration effect of China's high-speed railway on intercity connection ——A study based on media attention index," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 47-56.
    6. Laurent Scaringella & Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2016. "Grenoble–GIANT Territorial Innovation Models," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01472878, HAL.
    7. Ben Derudder, 2021. "Network Analysis of ‘Urban Systems’: Potential, Challenges, and Pitfalls," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 404-420, September.
    8. Peixin Li & Chen Wang & Xueliang Zhang, 2017. "Did city cluster development help improve labor productivity in China?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 122-135, January.
    9. Hugo Priemus, 2011. "URBAN DUTCH: Synergy Between Transport Infrastructures and Cities. Towards a Higher Productivity of the Economy," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1267, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Eunok Im, 2015. "The Effects of Interlocal Collaboration on Local Economic Performance: Investigation of Korean Cases," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1391, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Edward L. Glaeser & Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Yimei Zou, 2016. "Urban networks: Connecting markets, people, and ideas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 17-59, March.
    12. Wenfang Fu & Chuanjian Luo & Modan Yan, 2023. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote the Development of Cities? Evidence from the Urban Network Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Xihui Wang & Wei Dong, 2022. "Spatial Evolution and Driving Mechanism of City Networks in the Middle and Lower Ganges Valley from the 16th to the Mid-18th Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Christophe Sohn & Julien Licheron & Evert Meijers, 2022. "Border cities: Out of the shadow," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 417-438, April.
    15. Shengdong Nie & Hengkai Li, 2023. "Analysis of Construction Networks and Structural Characteristics of Pearl River Delta and Surrounding Cities Based on Multiple Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Akihiro Otsuka, 2021. "A new approach to inter‐regional network externalities in Japan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 1051-1067, June.
    17. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Marina Sheresheva & Matvey Oborin & Tatyana Gvarliani, 2017. "Networking of small cities to gain sustainability," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(1), pages 140-156, September.
    18. Tuzin Baycan Levent & Seda Kundak & Aliye Ahu Gulumser, 2006. "Eurocities and Their "Sisters": How Are They Close to Each Other?," ERSA conference papers ersa06p77, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Liang Wang & Fangfang Zhang & Yuzhu Zang & Jian Duan, 2022. "Understanding the Regional Integration Process from the Perspective of Agglomeration and Urban Networks: Case Study in Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Frank van Oort & Martijn Burger & Otto Raspe, 2010. "On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 725-748, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:3:y:2009:p:121-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.