IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pep/journl/v7y2002i1p23-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Creation and the Entrepreneurial Business

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Spivey

    (Wachovia Professor of Banking and Finance, Clemson University)

  • Jeffrey J. McMillan

    (Clemson University)

Abstract

The need to finance high growth and manage the interests and needs of investors makes value creation a critical concern for entrepreneurial businesses. Almost any financial endeavor, such as attracting new investors or making investment decisions, necessitates the consideration of the equity value created by the endeavor. The perceived value creation, for example, has a direct effect on the percentage of the firm outside investors will require if they are to invest in the business. Measuring the value created by publicly traded businesses, depending on the assumptions made, is relatively straightforward. If public markets are at least semi-strong form efficient (i.e., equity prices reflect all publicly available information regarding a business’s true underlying value), then the closing price on a large, publicly-traded company should accurately reflect that enterprise’s value. In other words, public markets take individual investors’ beliefs of the magnitude, timing and riskiness of the business’s expected future cash flows and incorporate them into the actual equity value reported at closing. Like the managers of large companies, the entrepreneur should think market value, rather than just accounting profits, when making economic decisions. Unfortunately, the major problem of measuring the value of an entrepreneurial business is that many are either privately-owned or are publicly-traded in very thin secondary markets, subsequently market assessment of the true value of the business’s equity is not readily available. This unavailability of market information makes the value creation assessment process more difficult for entrepreneurial companies, but certainly not any less important. Thus, information about the correlation of readily available performance measures with a true market value creation measure is worthwhile. This study statistically examines the relationship of non-market measures of value creation with a true market value creation measure for a sample of small publicly-traded companies (i.e., less than $100 million). We restricted the size of the companies we examined to make our sample more representative of entrepreneurial businesses, which are more likely to be either privately-held or traded very thinly in public markets. For the purposes of this study the market value creation measure utilized was shareholder return. Each company’s shareholder return was estimated using stock price and dividend information. Three different dimensions of non-market value creation measures were utilized. These three dimensions were accounting profitability, cash flow performance, and growth. Our investigation revealed that relationships between certain non-market measures of value and small entrepreneurial types of businesses existed. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between shareholder return and the earnings profitability measures of return on equity, return on assets and return on invested capital. These relationships were found to exist only for companies that reported positive earnings. Stronger relationships were found to exist between shareholder return and the cash flow performance measures of earnings growth and sales growth. Furthermore, the sales growth measure was found to be correlated for companies that had positive earnings and companies that reported negative earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Spivey & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2002. "Value Creation and the Entrepreneurial Business," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 7(1), pages 23-36, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:pep:journl:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:23-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jefsite.org/RePEc/pep/journl/jef-2002-07-1-d-spivey.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darryl Waldron & Carl M. Hubbard, 1991. "Valuation Methods and Estimates in Relationship to Investing versus Consulting," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 43-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henderson, James & Leleux, Benoit & White, Ian, 2006. "Service-for-equity arrangements: Untangling motives and conflicts," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 886-909, November.
    2. Chenchuramaiah T. Bathala & Oswald D. Bowlin & William P. Dukes, 2003. "Corporate Governance, Illiquidity, and Valuation Issues in Privately-Owned Corporations," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, Spring.
    3. Tarek Miloud & Mathieu Cabrol, 2011. "Les facteurs stratégiques influençant l'évaluation des start-ups par les capitaux-risqueurs," Post-Print hal-00951565, HAL.
    4. Sophie Manigart & Mike Wright & Ken Robbie & Philippe Desbrières & Koen De Waele, 1997. "Venture Capitalists’ Appraisal of Investment Projects: An Empirical European Study," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 21(4), pages 29-43, July.
    5. Tarek Miloud & Arild Aspelund & Mathieu Cabrol, 2012. "Startup valuation by venture capitalists: an empirical study," Post-Print hal-00951664, HAL.
    6. Charles P. Harper & Lawrence C. Rose, 1993. "Accuracy of Appraisers and Appraisal Methods of Closely Held Companies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(3), pages 21-33, April.
    7. Ge, Dingkun & Mahoney, James M. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2005. "New Venture Valuation by Venture Capitalists: An Integrative Approach," Working Papers 05-0124, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    8. William P. Dukes & Oswald D. Bowlin, 1993. "Valuation of Closely-Held Firms: Another Look," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 2(3), pages 189-202, Summer.
    9. William P. Dukes, 2001. "Where Do We Stand on Closely-Held Firm Valuation?," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 6(1), pages 129-155, Spring.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Value Creation; Entrepreneur; Small Business; Startup;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pep:journl:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:23-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Craig Everett (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bapepus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.