IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcz/alspcz/v3y2009i1p244-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetries In The Supply Chain Management Processes And Their Influence In The Case Of Collaborative Agreements In Virtual Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Michalski Marek

    (University Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid)

Abstract

The efficiency in the supply chain, as in other types of organizations structured as a network depends largely on the relationships that bind each and every participant [27.]. The influences, the achievement of the goal, the power reflected in the decision making process and access to technology and information are some of the factors upon which the degree of interdependence, the performance and position market supply chain. From this perspective, obtaining mutual benefits so that the process requires, management of the supply chain should be symmetrical [3.]. However, in reality the traditional business relationships between organizations in the supply chain are rarely symmetrical [19.]. The asymmetries can influence differently in the individual elements and the entire process of managing the supply chain. In some cases, the influence is a positive sign, since it can provide a source of additional income and improve the competitive position of the organization in the market. In others, has a negative sign, since it can be a source of creation and emergence of problems and conflicts at different levels of management process and in relations between the partner organizations [12.], [9.], [18.], [22.]. The aim of our research was to ascertain whether the conduct of directors in the asymmetric conditions in traditional environments and locations may vary in the case of collaborative virtual environments related to the Internet.

Suggested Citation

  • Michalski Marek, 2009. "Asymmetries In The Supply Chain Management Processes And Their Influence In The Case Of Collaborative Agreements In Virtual Environments," Advanced Logistic systems, University of Miskolc, Department of Material Handling and Logistics, vol. 3(1), pages 244-252, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pcz:alspcz:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:244-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.als.zim.pcz.pl/files/ASYMMETRIES-IN-THE-SUPPLY-CHAIN-MANAGEMENT-PROCESSES-AND-THEIR-INFLUENCE-IN-THE-CASE-OF-COLLABORATIVE-AGREEMENTS-IN-VIRTUAL-ENVIRONMENTS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.als.zim.pcz.pl/chapter-2---practical-logistic-solutions-2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    2. N/A, 2004. "Index for 2004," European Union Politics, , vol. 5(4), pages 511-512, December.
    3. Goyal, Suresh K. & Gupta, Yash P., 1989. "Integrated inventory models: The buyer-vendor coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 261-269, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Padilla Tinoco, Silvia Valeria & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2017. "Collaborative shipping under different cost-sharing agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 827-837.
    2. Samuel Yousefi & Mustafa Jahangoshai Rezaee & Maghsud Solimanpur, 2021. "Supplier selection and order allocation using two-stage hybrid supply chain model and game-based order price," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 553-588, March.
    3. Ricardo Ernst & Jose Ignacio López-Sánchez & David Urbano, 2009. "A Negotiation Model for Inducing Higher Service in a Distribution Channel," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 499-517, September.
    4. Maurizio Zanardi, 2004. "Antidumping law as a collusive device," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 95-122, February.
    5. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2009. "Splitting up value: A critical review of residual income theories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Michael Carter & Julian Wright, 1999. "Interconnection in Network Industries," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    9. Laruelle, Annick & Valenciano, Federico, 2008. "Noncooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley-Shubik index," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 341-353, May.
    10. Sakinah Mat Zin & Ahmad Azrin Adnan & Iskandar Hasan Abdullah, 2017. "How Can Ibn Khaldun’s Economic Philosophy Revive the Intellectual Capital of Entrepreneurs," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 164-164, June.
    11. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
    12. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "Monotonicity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 338-346.
    13. Yan, Ruiliang & Wang, John & Zhou, Bin, 2010. "Channel integration and profit sharing in the dynamics of multi-channel firms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 430-440.
    14. Marc Fleurbaey, 2000. "Choix social : une difficulté et de multiples possibilités," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 51(5), pages 1215-1232.
    15. Guth, Werner & Ritzberger, Klaus & van Damme, Eric, 2004. "On the Nash bargaining solution with noise," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 697-713, June.
    16. Sandy Tubeuf & Marc Perronnin, 2008. "New prospects in the analysis of inequalities in health: a measurement of health encompassing several dimensions of health," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 08/01, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    18. Huang, Chao-Kuei & Tsai, Deng-Maw & Wu, Ji-Cheng & Chung, Kun-Jen, 2010. "An integrated vendor-buyer inventory model with order-processing cost reduction and permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 473-478, April.
    19. Pinkley, Robin L. & Conlon, Donald E. & Sawyer, John E. & Sleesman, Dustin J. & Vandewalle, Don & Kuenzi, Maribeth, 2019. "The power of phantom alternatives in negotiation: How what could be haunts what is," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 34-48.
    20. Wen Li Cheng & Jeffrey Sachs & Xiaokai Yang, 2005. "An Inframarginal Analysis Of The Ricardian Model," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 6, pages 87-107, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:alspcz:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:244-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.