IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pch/abante/v4y2001i2p193-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valoracion De Atributos De Profesionales Universitarios

Author

Listed:
  • JESSICA CORIA

    (Escuela de Administración, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)

  • PABLO MARSHALL

    (Escuela de Administración, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)

Abstract

This study analyzes the needs and preferences of firms in the first-job market. To this end, an application to the case of commercial engineers in Chile is considered by means of a conjoint study. Partial utilities of the firms associated to different levels of attributes of the applicants are derived. The results show that the most relevant attributes for the commercial engineers in Chile are the level of specialization, the capacity for team work, the university where the applicant obtained the degree and the proficiency in English. Some of these attributes can be controlled by the universities and used in the design of more successful professional programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Coria & Pablo Marshall, 2001. "Valoracion De Atributos De Profesionales Universitarios," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 193-213.
    • Handle: RePEc:pch:abante:v:4:y:2001:i:2:p:193-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.abante.cl/files/ABT/Contenidos/Vol-4-N2/3Coria%20Marshal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul E. Green & Abba M. Krieger, 1996. "Individualized Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 850-867, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winfried Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2002. "A Probabilistic One-Step Approach to the Optimal Product Line Design Problem Using Conjoint and Cost Data," Review of Marketing Science Working Papers 1-4-1003, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    2. B. P. S. Murthi & Sumit Sarkar, 2003. "The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1344-1362, October.
    3. Dong, Songting & Ding, Min & Huber, Joel, 2010. "A simple mechanism to incentive-align conjoint experiments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 25-32.
    4. Ulengin, Fusun & Ilker Topcu, Y. & Sahin, Sule Onsel, 2001. "An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 179-192, October.
    5. Kyle D. Chen & Warren H. Hausman, 2000. "Technical Note: Mathematical Properties of the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 327-332, February.
    6. Slavomir Bednar & Jan Modrak, 2015. "Product Variety Management As A Tool For Successful Mass Customized Product Structure," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 16-25, DEcember.
    7. Paul E. Green & Abba M. Krieger & Yoram Wind, 2001. "Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3_supplem), pages 56-73, June.
    8. van der Rhee, Bo & Verma, Rohit & Plaschka, Gerhard, 2009. "Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 30-41, July.
    9. Fahim Ullah & Mansoor K Khattak & Kang Min, 2018. "Experimental investigation of the comparison of compound parabolic concentrator and ordinary heat pipe-type solar concentrator," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(5), pages 770-783, August.
    10. Ulengin, Burc & Ulengin, Fusun & Guvenc, Umit, 2001. "A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 361-374, April.
    11. Michalek, Jeremy J. & Ebbes, Peter & Adigüzel, Feray & Feinberg, Fred M. & Papalambros, Panos Y., 2011. "Enhancing marketing with engineering: Optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-12.
    12. Burc Ulengin & Fusun Ulengin & Umit Guvenc, 1998. "Urban quality of life in Istanbul: Priorities and segmentation," ERSA conference papers ersa98p297, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Frank Bodendorf & Manuel Lutz & Jörg Franke, 2021. "Valuation and pricing of software licenses to support supplier–buyer negotiations: A case study in the automotive industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1686-1702, October.
    14. B. P. S. Murthi & Sumit Sarkar, 2003. "The Role of the Mangement Sciences in Research on Personalization," Review of Marketing Science Working Papers 2-2-1025, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    15. Jong Seok Kim, 2017. "Empirical Analysis Of Consumer Willingness To Pay For Smart Phone Attributes In Multi-Countries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-37, February.
    16. S Tsafarakis & E Grigoroudis & N Matsatsinis, 2011. "Consumer choice behaviour and new product development: an integrated market simulation approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1253-1267, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conjoint Analysis; Marketing Research; Design of University Degree Programs; Chile;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • C42 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Survey Methods
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pch:abante:v:4:y:2001:i:2:p:193-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduardo Walker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eapuccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.