IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v2y2008i1p30-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planned methodological changes to the Index of Production

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Walton

    (Office for National Statistics)

  • Robin Youll

    (Office for National Statistics)

  • Chris Hunt

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

Sets out the reasons for these changes and their impact on the levels of detail ONS will publishIn January 2008, as part of a wider reprioritisation of the Office for National Statistics? (ONS) business, the sample size for the Monthly Production Inquiry (MPI) will be reduced by 17 per cent. Of itself, the reduced sample size would lead to lower-quality estimates of the change in production output as published in the Index of Production (IoP) First Release. However, ONS will introduce a number of methodological changes in March 2008, including a reoptimisation of the MPI sample. These changes will maintain, and in some cases improve, the quality of the aggregate IoP indices. At the same time, the level of detail published for the IoP will be reduced, providing greater focus on the aggregate series. This article sets out the reasons for the methodological changes and their impact on the levels of detail which ONS will publish. Economic & Labour Market Review (2008) 2, 30–37; doi:10.1057/elmr.2008.7

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Walton & Robin Youll & Chris Hunt, 2008. "Planned methodological changes to the Index of Production," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(1), pages 30-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:30-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n1/pdf/elmr20087a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n1/full/elmr20087a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:30-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.