IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/compes/v53y2011i1p83-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was the Gradual Approach Not Possible in the USSR? A Critique of the Sachs-Woo ‘Impossibility Hypothesis’

Author

Listed:
  • Nazrul Islam

    (International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development (ICSEAD), 11-4 Otemchi, Kokurakita, Kitakyushu, 803-0814 Japan.)

Abstract

This paper examines the Sachs-Woo hypothesis that the gradual approach to reform, though successful in China, was not possible in the USSR because of structural differences between these two economies. To examine this hypothesis, this paper abstracts from the issue of structural differences by focusing on the industrial sector only and compares the state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms in China under Deng and in the USSR under Gorbachev. Apart from concerning the same sector, these reforms were roughly contemporaneous, and hence their comparison provides a suitable test of the Sachs-Woo hypothesis. The test shows that the hypothesis does not live up to it.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazrul Islam, 2011. "Was the Gradual Approach Not Possible in the USSR? A Critique of the Sachs-Woo ‘Impossibility Hypothesis’," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 53(1), pages 83-147, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:53:y:2011:i:1:p:83-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v53/n1/pdf/ces201030a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v53/n1/full/ces201030a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:53:y:2011:i:1:p:83-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.