IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/compes/v47y2005i4p652-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Productivity and Profitability: A Comparative Analysis of Selected New and Existing EU Member States1

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Davidova

    (Imperial College Wye Campus, AEBM, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH, UK.)

  • Matthew Gorton

    (University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK)

  • Tomas Ratinger

    (The Czech Institute of Agricultural Economics, Czech Republic)

  • Katarzyna Zawalinska

    (CASE Foundation, Poland)

  • Belen Iraizoz

    (Public University of Navarra, Spain)

Abstract

This paper attempts to shed light on the recent performance of farms in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland and to compare the findings with the situation in two regions of existing EU Member States. Utilising farm survey data, ratios of agricultural profitability and productivity have been estimated. Analysis indicates that Hungarian farms have the best prospects among the analysed CEECs according to their profitability. The poor profitability and structural problems of Polish agriculture are highlighted. Family farms are less productive than corporate farms in the Czech Republic and Hungary despite the expectations at the outset of the reform that better incentives would boost their productivity. Comparative Economic Studies (2005) 47, 652–674. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100066

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Davidova & Matthew Gorton & Tomas Ratinger & Katarzyna Zawalinska & Belen Iraizoz, 2005. "Farm Productivity and Profitability: A Comparative Analysis of Selected New and Existing EU Member States1," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 47(4), pages 652-674, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:47:y:2005:i:4:p:652-674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v47/n4/pdf/8100066a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v47/n4/full/8100066a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomas Hlavsa & Jindrich Spicka & Marie Stolbova & Zuzana Hlouskova, 2020. "Statistical analysis of economic viability of farms operating in Czech areas facing natural constraints," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 193-202.
    2. Kelvin Balcombe & Sophia Davidova & Laure Latruffe, 2005. "Productivity change in Polish agriculture : an application of a bootstrap procedure to Malmquist indices," Post-Print hal-02285625, HAL.
    3. Jindrich Spicka & Tomas Hlavsa & Katerina Soukupova & Marie Stolbova, 2019. "Approaches to estimation the farm-level economic viability and sustainability in agriculture: A literature review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 289-297.
    4. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelínek, Ladislav & Hruška, Martin & Medonos, Tomáš & Vilhelm, Václav, 2013. "The Effect of Heterogeneous Buyers on Agricultural Land Prices: The Case of the Czech Land Market," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 62(2).
    5. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelínek, Ladislav & Hruška, Martin & Medonos, Tomáš & Vilhelm, Václav, 2013. "The Effect of Heterogeneous Buyers on Agricultural Land Prices: The Case of the Czech Land Market," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(02), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Jindřich Špička & Petr Dereník, 2021. "How opportunity costs change the view on the viability of farms? Empirical evidence from the EU," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 41-50.
    7. Nizamettin Bayyurt & Fatma Eban Arıkan, 2015. "Good Governance and Agricultural Efficiency," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 14-23.
    8. Antonella Basso & Maria Bruna Zolin, 2023. "Analyzing the land and labour productivity of farms producing renewable energy: the Italian case study," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 153-172, April.
    9. Zuzana Hloušková & Michaela Lekešová & Anna Prajerová & Tomáš Doucha, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Agricultural Holdings with the Inclusion of Opportunity Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:47:y:2005:i:4:p:652-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.