Reform Strategies and Economic Performance: The Russian Far East as Compared to Other Regions
AbstractAs compared to other Russian regions, the Far East regions do not perform differently in terms of output and investment change. Initial conditions (resource advantages) and the strength of the institutions (the ability of the authorities to contain investment risk and shadow economy and to promote business climate favorable for the emergence of small businesses) have considerable impact on output and investment. But there is no evidence that economic reforms in the regions (deregulation of prices, small privatization) pay off in a sense that they lead to better output and investment dynamics. In contrast, for interpreting regional differences in per capita income change, reform progress is an important explanatory variable. It turns out that the major impact of reforms was not to boost output and investment, but to redirect incomes into the pro-reform regions (also the regions with larger shadow economy, lower investment risk and better business climate for small enterprises, liberal-minded electorate and lower increases in crime rates). However, changes in personal income in the Far East lag behind those in other regions with similar output performance. This Far East “income under-performance” phenomenon is explained by (1) by the reduction of subsidies in the 1990s that were used before transition to finance greater costs of housing and social infrastructure in the Far East, (2) by the income adjustment (rather than employment and output adjustment) of the Far East regions facing the challenge of restructuring. In contrast to Central Europe, this former type of adjustment was more typical for Russian enterprises facing competitive pressure. Comparative Economic Studies (2001) 43, 33–66; doi:10.1057/ces.2001.19
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Palgrave Macmillan in its journal Comparative Economic Studies.
Volume (Year): 43 (2001)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/
Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Vladimir Popov, 2011.
"Mortality Crisis in Russia Revisited: Evidence from Cross-regional Comparison,"
w0157, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
- Popov, Vladimir, 2009. "Mortality Crisis in Russia Revisited: Evidence from Cross-Regional Comparison," MPRA Paper 21311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2009.
- Patrick Hamm & Lawrence King, 2010. "Post-Manichean Economics: Foreign Investment, State Capacity and Economic Development in Transition Economies," Working Papers wp227, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elizabeth Gale).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.