IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/en-78-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Charges on Flow and Charges on Balance in Individual-Account Pension Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Chávez-Bedoya
  • Nelson Ramírez Rondán

Abstract

In this present article, we develop a discrete-time methodology to compare front-end load and balance fees in the accumulation phase of a definedcontribution pension fund under a system of individual accounts. Using this methodology, we study the effect of risk aversion and other relevant variables in the performance and suitability of the aforementioned types of fees. Finally, we carry out a practical application and show the results for the Peruvian Private Pension System, including indifference values between fees and certainty equivalent ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Chávez-Bedoya & Nelson Ramírez Rondán, 2016. "Comparison between Charges on Flow and Charges on Balance in Individual-Account Pension Systems," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 43(78), pages 61-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:en-78-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/752/817
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:en-78-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.