IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v21y2007i1p93-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Owen O'Donnell
  • Eddy van Doorslaer
  • Ravi P. Rannan-Eliya
  • Aparnaa Somanathan
  • Shiva Raj Adhikari
  • Deni Harbianto
  • Charu C. Garg
  • Piya Hanvoravongchai
  • Mohammed N. Huq
  • Anup Karan
  • Gabriel M. Leung
  • Chiu Wan Ng
  • Badri Raj Pande
  • Keith Tin
  • Kanjana Tisayaticom
  • Laksono Trisnantoro
  • Yuhui Zhang
  • Yuxin Zhao

Abstract

The article compares the incidence of public healthcare across 11 Asian countries and provinces, testing the dominance of healthcare concentration curves against an equal distribution and Lorenz curves and across countries. The analysis reveals that the distribution of public healthcare is prorich in most developing countries. That distribution is avoidable, but a propoor incidence is easier to realize at higher national incomes. The experiences of Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand suggest that increasing the incidence of propoor healthcare requires limiting the use of user fees, or protecting the poor effectively from them, and building a wide network of health facilities. Economic growth may not only relax the government budget constraint on propoor policies but also increase propoor incidence indirectly by raising richer individuals' demand for private sector alternatives. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Owen O'Donnell & Eddy van Doorslaer & Ravi P. Rannan-Eliya & Aparnaa Somanathan & Shiva Raj Adhikari & Deni Harbianto & Charu C. Garg & Piya Hanvoravongchai & Mohammed N. Huq & Anup Karan & Gabriel M., 2007. "The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from Asia," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 21(1), pages 93-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:93-123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:93-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.