IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v40y2012i1p97-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinarity in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Gaston Heimeriks

Abstract

In this paper we study developments in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology in the period 1998--2008. The fields show changing interdisciplinary characteristics in relation to distinct co-evolutionary dynamics in research, science and society. Biotechnology emerged as a discipline in publication patterns at the same time as the number of biotechnology departments increased, whereas genomics emerged as a stable discipline, while the number of genomics departments declined. Nanotechnology maintains an interdisciplinary journal citation pattern while the number of nanotechnology departments increased. In all three fields the importance of industry--university collaborations increased, albeit to different degrees. Patterns of interdisciplinarity can thus be distinguished, as different ways in which the three dynamics co-evolve. From a governance perspective, this conceptualization provides distinct rationales for policy interventions in relation to interdisciplinarity in research, science and society. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaston Heimeriks, 2012. "Interdisciplinarity in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 97-112, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2012:i:1:p:97-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scs070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang Wu & Miao Jin & Xiu-Hao Ding, 2015. "Diversity of individual research disciplines in scientific funding," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 669-686, May.
    2. Gaston Heimeriks & Pierre-Alexandre Balland, 2016. "How smart is specialisation? An analysis of specialisation patterns in knowledge production," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 562-574.
    3. Nomaler, Önder & Frenken, Koen & Heimeriks, Gaston, 2013. "Do more distant collaborations have more citation impact?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 966-971.
    4. Hajdeja Iglič & Patrick Doreian & Luka Kronegger & Anuška Ferligoj, 2017. "With whom do researchers collaborate and why?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 153-174, July.
    5. Boschma, Ron & Heimeriks, Gaston & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 107-114.
    6. Lauto, Giancarlo & Valentin, Finn, 2016. "The knowledge production model of the New Sciences: The case of Translational Medicine," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 12-21.
    7. Wooseok Jang & Heeyeul Kwon & Yongtae Park & Hakyeon Lee, 2018. "Predicting the degree of interdisciplinarity in academic fields: the case of nanotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 231-254, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2012:i:1:p:97-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.