IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v33y2006i1p59-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research and development: how the ‘D’ got into R&D

Author

Listed:
  • Benoît Godin

Abstract

This paper traces the history of the concept of research and development (R&D) through 70 years of work on taxonomies and statistics on research. It identifies three stages in the construction of development as a category. First, development was only a series or list of activities without a label, but identified for inclusion in questionnaire responses. Second, development came to be identified as such by way of creating a subcategory of research, alongside basic and applied research. Third, development became a separate category, alongside research. It gave us the acronym we now know and use: R&D. Although it is a category of industrial origins, three factors contributed to the inclusion of development in official definitions of research: organizational, analytical, and political. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Benoît Godin, 2006. "Research and development: how the ‘D’ got into R&D," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 59-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:1:p:59-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154306781779190
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:1:p:59-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.