IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v8y1999i2p132-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) peer-review procedures 1995–1996

Author

Listed:
  • W J Nuttall

Abstract

This paper reports on a survey of UK members of the Institute of Physics selected on the basis of an expected research association to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) during the years 1995 and 1996. The survey assesses the EPSRC's ‘college’ system for research evaluation from the perspective of members of the EPSRC's colleges and from those researchers who have only seen the system from the outside. Insights into the workings of a college-based peer-review system are gained, particularly in regard to referee expertise and the most effective provision of information to prioritisation committees who must award or decline applications formally based on referee opinion of an applicant's submission. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • W J Nuttall, 1999. "Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) peer-review procedures 1995–1996," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 132-140, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:2:p:132-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154499781777568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:2:p:132-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.