IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v18y2009i4p323-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service marks as indicators for innovation in knowledge-based services

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Schmoch
  • Stephan Gauch

Abstract

It has long been a tradition in the field of innovation research to use quantitative indicators to measure the extent of innovation activities and analyze them in from a comparative cross-national perspective. For instance, using patents is an established way of assessing innovation output in the realm of technologies and products. With the growing relevance of services as an important economic activity, the need for specific indicators that can be used to measure innovation output in this context is growing. In this paper we discuss the possibilities and limits of using service marks as basic innovation indicators for services. As most macroanalyses on the basis of marks are not harnessing their full potential, improved methods for more detailed approaches are presented. In detail, the use of community trademarks proves to be insufficient for valid statistical analyses; international registrations combined with community trademarks should be used instead. Some examples are given to illustrate the potential of this approach on a lower level of aggregation. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Schmoch & Stephan Gauch, 2009. "Service marks as indicators for innovation in knowledge-based services," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 323-335, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:323-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820209X451023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:323-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.