IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v14y2005i3p199-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handcrafted by 16 men: The impact of single and multiple authorship in collaborative research networks

Author

Listed:
  • John Rigby

Abstract

It is now widely believed that the more numerous the authors of a scientific paper, the greater is the likelihood of higher citation impact. By contrast, this paper considers a set of single- and multiple-authored publications in a group of matched journals that have resulted from collaborative research networks funded by the Austrian Science Fund, and presents evidence that no statistically significant relationship is found between multiple-authored papers and higher citation impact over single-authored papers. Moreover, within the data set examined, some evidence is found of a negative relationship between increasing numbers of authors and higher citation impact. The implication is drawn that where research is carried out within larger networks where researchers may benefit from a more general rather than a more specific collaboration, some researchers may publish their more important work through single-authored papers in order to enhance their reputations. Further implications of these findings are then considered for research funders and researchers. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • John Rigby, 2005. "Handcrafted by 16 men: The impact of single and multiple authorship in collaborative research networks," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 199-206, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:199-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154405781776148
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Antonio Orozco Castro, 2015. "Diversidad y heterogeneidad en redes de colaboración científica. Un estudio de las escuelas de administración de América Latina," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, edition 1, number 44, April.
    2. Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez & Elea Giménez-Toledo, 2013. "Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: a quantitative approach for the Spanish case," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 893-910, March.
    3. Goya Harirchi & Göran Melin & Shapour Etemad, 2007. "An exploratory study of the feature of Iranian co-authorships in biology, chemistry and physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(1), pages 11-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:199-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.