IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v17y2013i4p1535-1569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging Surprises, Jumps, and Model Misspecification: A Risk Management Perspective on Hedging S&P 500 Options

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Kaeck

Abstract

This article provides comprehensive tests of alternative jump-diffusion models for the purpose of hedging S&P 500 options. We explicitly take into account the risk arising from price and variance jumps and assess the hedging performance by focusing on the ability of competing specifications to forecast hedging errors. To this end, we devise density prediction tests and find evidence that jumps are important features of S&P 500 index dynamics. All jump-diffusion models tested in this article show signs of misspecification, but the inclusion of jumps can improve the hedging performance and risk assessment, especially in two-instrument hedges. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Kaeck, 2013. "Hedging Surprises, Jumps, and Model Misspecification: A Risk Management Perspective on Hedging S&P 500 Options," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1535-1569.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:1535-1569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfs027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Audrino, Francesco & Fengler, Matthias R., 2015. "Are classical option pricing models consistent with observed option second-order moments? Evidence from high-frequency data," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 46-63.
    2. Leonidas S. Rompolis & Elias Tzavalis, 2017. "Pricing and hedging contingent claims using variance and higher order moment swaps," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 531-550, April.
    3. Maciej Augustyniak & Alexandru Badescu & Mathieu Boudreault, 2023. "On the Measurement of Hedging Effectiveness for Long-Term Investment Guarantees," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Harish S. Bhat & Nitesh Kumar, 2015. "Large-Scale Empirical Tests of the Markov Tree Model," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-39, July.
    5. Neumann, Maximilian & Prokopczuk, Marcel & Wese Simen, Chardin, 2016. "Jump and variance risk premia in the S&P 500," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 72-83.
    6. Augustyniak, Maciej & Badescu, Alexandru & Bégin, Jean-François, 2023. "A discrete-time hedging framework with multiple factors and fat tails: On what matters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 416-444.
    7. Xiao, Yuewen & Zhao, Jing, 2021. "Price dynamics of individual stocks: Jumps and information," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:1535-1569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.