IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v16y2012i4p935-984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium Implications of Delegated Asset Management under Benchmarking

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Leippold
  • Philippe Rohner

Abstract

Despite the enormous growth of the asset management industry during the past decades, little is known about the asset pricing implications of investment intermediaries. Standard models of investment theory neither address the distinction between individual and institutional investors nor the potential implications of direct investing and delegated investing. In a model with endogenous delegation, the authors find that delegation leads to a more informative price system and lower equity premia. In the presence of relative return objectives, stocks exhibiting high correlations with the benchmark have significantly lower returns than stocks with low correlations. The authors' empirical results support the model's predictions. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Leippold & Philippe Rohner, 2012. "Equilibrium Implications of Delegated Asset Management under Benchmarking," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 16(4), pages 935-984.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:16:y:2012:i:4:p:935-984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfq036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:16:y:2012:i:4:p:935-984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.