IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v22y2000i1p77-88..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct Market Retailer Perceptions of State-Sponsored Marketing Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Ramu Govindasamy
  • John Italia
  • Daymon Thatch

Abstract

Direct market retailers were surveyed to evaluate their participation and opinions of the Jersey Fresh state marketing program. Other states interested in establishing a similar marketing program could target retailers who are most likely to participate in such a program. Specifically, the study results suggest that retailers with outlets in urban areas or with retail outlets open for more than eight months during the year would be more likely to participate. Retailers who used other logos to identify their fresh produce were more likely to intend to use state promotional logos in the future. Asuccessful approach to recruiting these retailers might be to form partnerships with local cooperative organizations which label and market produce from many growers collectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramu Govindasamy & John Italia & Daymon Thatch, 2000. "Direct Market Retailer Perceptions of State-Sponsored Marketing Programs," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 77-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:22:y:2000:i:1:p:77-88.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1058-7195.t01-1-00007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngobo, Paul-Valentin & Jean, Sylvie, 2012. "Does store image influence demand for organic store brands?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 621-628.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:22:y:2000:i:1:p:77-88.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.