Productivity Dynamics with Technology Choice: An Application to Automobile Assembly
AbstractDuring the 1980's, all Japanese automobile producers opened assembly plants in North America. Industry analysts and previous research claim that these transplants are more productive than incumbent plants and that they produce with a substantially different production process. I compare the production processes by estimating a model that allows for heterogeneity in technology and productivity, both of which are intrinsically unobservable. The model is estimated on a panel of assembly plants, controlling for capacity utilization and price effects.The results indicate that the more recent technology uses capital more intensively and it has a higher elasticity of substitution between labour and capital. Hicks-neutral productivity growth is estimated to be lower, while capital-biased (labour-saving) productivity growth is higher for the new technology. Using the estimation results, I decompose industry-wide productivity growth and find plant-level changes in lean plants to be the most important contributor. Plant-level productivity growth is further decomposed to reveal the importance of capital-biased productivity growth, increases in the capital-labour ratio, and returns to scale. Copyright 2003, Wiley-Blackwell.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal The Review of Economic Studies.
Volume (Year): 70 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Other versions of this item:
- Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2003. "Productivity Dynamics with Technology Choice: An Application to Automobile Assembly," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 167-198, January.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Allan Collard-Wexler & Jan De Loecker, 2013.
"Reallocation and Technology: Evidence From The U.S. Steel Industry,"
13-06, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
- Allan Collard-Wexler & Jan De Loecker, 2012. "Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the U.S. Steel Industry," Working Papers 1402, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
- Allan Collard-Wexler & Jan De Loecker, 2013. "Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the U.S. Steel Industry," NBER Working Papers 18739, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Collard-Wexler, Allan & De Loecker, Jan, 2013. "Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the U.S. Steel Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 9331, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2006.
"Complementarities in Automobile Production,"
NBER Working Papers
12131, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Van Reenen, John, 2011.
"Does competition raise productivity through improving management quality?,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 306-316, May.
- John Van Reenen, 2010. "Does Competition Raise Productivity Through Improving Management Quality?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Aamir Rafique HASHMI & Johannes VAN BIESEBROECK, 2012.
"The relationship between market structure and innovation in industry equilibrium: a case study of the global automobile industry,"
Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers
ces12.01, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
- Aamir Hashmi, 2012. "The Relationship between Market Structure and Innovation in Industry Equilibrium: A Case Study of the Global Automobile Industry," 2012 Meeting Papers 356, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Hashmi, Aamir Rafique & Van Biesebroeck, Johannes, 2012. "The Relationship between Market Structure and Innovation in Industry Equilibrium: A Case Study of the Global Automobile Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 8783, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Aamir Rafique Hashmi & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2010. "Market Structure and Innovation: A Dynamic Analysis of the Global Automobile Industry," NBER Working Papers 15959, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Cynthia Bansak & Norman Morin & Martha Starr, 2003.
"Technology, Capital Spending, and Capacity Utilization,"
0010, San Diego State University, Department of Economics.
- Cynthia Bansak & Norman Morin & Martha Starr, 2007. "Technology, Capital Spending, And Capacity Utilization," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(3), pages 631-645, 07.
- Cynthia Bansak & Norman Morin & Martha Starr, 2004. "Technology, capital spending, and capacity utilization," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2004-30, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- Peter M. Kort & Ruslan Lukach & Joseph Plasmans, 2007.
"Strategic R&D with Knowledge Spillovers and Endogenous Time to Complete,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
2027, CESifo Group Munich.
- Lukach, R. & Kort, P.M. & Plasmans, J.E.J., 2007. "Strategic R&D with Knowledge Spillovers and Endogenous Time to Complete," Discussion Paper 2007-38, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Lukach, R. & Kort, P.M. & Plasmans, J.E.J., 2005.
"Optimal R&D Investment Strategies with Quantity Competition under the Threat of Superior Entry,"
Open Access publications from Tilburg University
urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-178526, Tilburg University.
- Ruslan Lukach & Peter M. Kort & Joseph Plasmans, 2005. "Optimal R&D Investment Strategies with Quantity Competition under the Threat of Superior Entry," CESifo Working Paper Series 1385, CESifo Group Munich.
- Hyytinen, Ari & Maliranta, Mika, 2013. "Firm lifecycles and evolution of industry productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1080-1098.
- Johannes van Biesebroeck, 2002. "The Effect of Technology Choice on Automobile Assembly Plant Productivity," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 33(1), pages 65-73.
- T. Buchmann & D. Hain & Muhamed Kudic & M. Müller, 2014. "Exploring the Evolution of Innovation Networks in Science-driven and Scale-intensive Industries: New Evidence from a Stochastic Actor-based Approach," IWH Discussion Papers 1, Halle Institute for Economic Research.
- Ackerberg, Daniel & Caves, Kevin & Frazer, Garth, 2006. "Structural identification of production functions," MPRA Paper 38349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- TAKEDA Yosuke & UCHIDA Ichihiro, 2009. "Technological Externalities and Economic Distance: A case of the Japanese automobile suppliers," Discussion papers 09051, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
- Chad Syverson, 2011.
"What Determines Productivity?,"
Journal of Economic Literature,
American Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 326-65, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.