IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v29y2013i2p326-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rebalancing act: rationales and policies for sectoral economic rebalancing

Author

Listed:
  • Stian Westlake

Abstract

Since the financial crisis of 2008, policy-makers in developed countries have shown a renewed interest in the sectoral composition of their national economies, in particular whether their manufacturing sector is too small or their financial sector too large. These concerns have been described as ‘imbalances’ and the remedy as ‘rebalancing’, and they have been widely covered in the media. But many economists are sceptical, arguing that the concept of sectoral balance is not meaningful, or that sectoral imbalance is nothing to worry about, or that, even if it is, policy-makers can do little about it. This paper explores the concept of sectoral rebalancing, considers the evidence for sectoral imbalance in the economies of rich countries, and examines the arguments why rebalancing might be a good thing. It finds that while arguments for interventions to restrict the risk and growth of the financial services sector have considerable evidence to support them, arguments that manufacturing output is especially desirable and should be promoted more than other sectors are less well evidenced. Finally, the paper considers recent policies that have been introduced to change the sectoral structures of economies, and sets out some principles for would-be rebalancers to follow. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stian Westlake, 2013. "Rebalancing act: rationales and policies for sectoral economic rebalancing," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 326-343, SUMMER.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:29:y:2013:i:2:p:326-343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grt022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:29:y:2013:i:2:p:326-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.