IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v27y2011i4p589-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The changing architecture of the UK welfare state

Author

Listed:
  • John Hills

Abstract

This article looks at the way in which the role of the state has evolved within different aspects of welfare activity (broadly defined) in the United Kingdom since 1979 and forward to the possible impacts of the plans of the Coalition government that took office in 2010 for changing that role through reform and fiscal retrenchment. Even as governments restrained the growth of public social spending, total public and private activity grew by more than 150 per cent in real terms between 1979--80 and 2007--8, and from 34 to 42 per cent of GDP. If state services have not grown rapidly enough, some have paid more privately for the services they want, and in other cases governments have ended up financing activity through indirect routes. There has always been a 'mixed economy' of welfare in terms of the balance between public and private provision, finance, and control. Changes in this balance have been slow, with the largest growth being in the 'pure private sector' (with private provision, finance, and control), but with some growth in publicly financed services that are contracted out to the private sector. The experience suggests that the Coalition government's initial ambitions for radically transforming the overall structure of public--private boundaries may be hard to realize. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hills, 2011. "The changing architecture of the UK welfare state," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 589-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:27:y:2011:i:4:p:589-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grr032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edmiston, Daniel, 2011. "The shifting balance of private and public welfare activity in the United Kingdom, 1979 to 2007," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43901, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Mark Fransham & Ruth Patrick & Aaron Reeves & Kitty Stewart, 2020. "Did the introduction of the benefit cap in Britain harm mental health? A natural experiment approach," CASE Papers /221, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. Reeves, Aaron Samuel & Fransham, Mark James & Stewart, Kitty Judith & Patrick, Ruth, 2020. "Did the introduction of the benefit cap in Britain harm mental health? A natural experiment approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121527, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Tania Burchardt, 2013. "Re-visiting the conceptual framework for public/private boundaries in welfare," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Research Note 002, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:27:y:2011:i:4:p:589-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.