IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v71y2019i3p666-686..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Total factor productivity growth in English agriculture: 1690–1914

Author

Listed:
  • David Maddison
  • Katrin Rehdanz

Abstract

The rate of TFP growth in agriculture is sometimes thought of as facilitating the wider industrial revolution. We use data on rents, prices, wages, the cost of inventories and the user-cost of man-made capital to analyse productivity change in agriculture in England between 1690 and 1914. Adopting an approach based on the profit function we find that the rate of profit augmentation was 0.4% whilst the output and input based rates of TFP growth were 0.1 and 0.2% respectively. We cannot reject the null hypothesis that the profit function for agriculture is stable. At least in economic terms agriculture exhibited steady progress rather than revolutionary change.

Suggested Citation

  • David Maddison & Katrin Rehdanz, 2019. "Total factor productivity growth in English agriculture: 1690–1914," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 666-686.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:71:y:2019:i:3:p:666-686.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpy055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N53 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:71:y:2019:i:3:p:666-686.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.