Kimball (1991) showed that consumers who face an unavoidable risk will display "temperance", meaning that they will increase their holdings of safe assets. In principle, temperance could provide an explanation for the stockholding puzzle, which is the microeconomic manifestation of the equity premium puzzle. Previous work has shown that the temperance effect induced by labor income uncertainty is too small to explain the stockholding puzzle. This paper finds that committed expenditure risk associated with homeownership induces enough additional temperance to explain the puzzle. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 53 (2001) Issue (Month): 2 (April) Pages: 241-59 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:53:y:2001:i:2:p:241-59
Contact details of provider: Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK Fax: 01865 267 985 Email: Web page: http://oep.oupjournals.org/
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)